The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001.
The table illustrates the average spending on a monthly basis of the family in Australia in two years 1991 and 2001.
Overall, the amount of money spent on Other goods and services was the highest in both years while the opposite was true for Clothing. In addition, there was an increase in almost all kinds of goods and services that the Australian family spent from 1991 to 2001, except for Clothing and Transport.
In two years, the expenditure of Non-essential goods witnessed a minimal rise of 20 Australian Dollars, from 250 AUD to 270 AUD, accounted for nearly a third of the total spending. This was followed by the figure for food, at 155 AUD in 1991 and 160 AUD in 2001. A similar trend was experienced for housing, at 95 AUD and 100 AUD, respectively.
A significant improvement was seen in the amount of money spending on Electricity and Water of Australian families, from 75 AUD to 120 AUD. By contrast, the monthly expenditure for Transport plummeted to only 25 AUD in 2001 and the goods and services which an average family in Australia spent monthly dropped by one-third belonged to Clothing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-07 | shailipatel | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-01 | Drake004 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-27 | Mphthao | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-27 | Mphthao | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | Phuong Khanh | 73 | view |
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and the present Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 84
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77202072539 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76168233374 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512953367876 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4419775107 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251123384725 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128358077656 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125540955109 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194867422492 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108045803873 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.