The count held by some that university students should focus on subjects that will be useful in the future like science and technology is apparently vulnerable on the ground of two reasons. Let me delve into details for you.
Firstly, the argument about usefulness will never be settled. Scientists may believe that subjects associated with science accounts for the majority proportion of whole human knowledge leading human race to explore the mysteries of obscure universe. Yet artists will defend that aesthetic ability matters too with function of providing delicate interior spaces, fashionable garments. Entomology cannot be eliminated just for reason that some consider it as useless. Actually, entomology open a window into the world we shared in a different angle by observing habitats of insects, how these little cute critters survive and so on. In the scenario, every subject play its part serving to the common goat, discovering the cosmic and ourselves, and no one can be kicked out from attention. Like all living things on Earth deserve to be respected, to be protected, to be learned as when nature surfer, we surfer. What we know about this world is still a tiptoe of iceberg. So we should not let our small minds constrain university students’ desire in several limited areas.
Moreover, almost all of genius or pioneers in their particular fields made a huge contribution to human being due to their persistent pursuits and lasting interests. Interest is powerful dynamo pushing students to dig further and further. Interest is the key to open a new world when we encounter obstacles just like Hubble happened to find theory of big bang when he was furious about why starts got further away from us. Interest is a effective learning method to let us devote our whole time even whole life voluntarily to make a difference rather than forced by ambitious. Things are totally different when it comes to personal career expectations, students only care about, especially when they are blocked, whether learning this subject is useful and probabilities to quit account for a large proportion compared to learn for fun.
In the nutshell, university students should be encouraged to study whatever they are fond of. What we pass down to our next generations is our virtues rather than teaching them only care about what is useful.
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this option? What sort of punishment should parents and 68
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarise the information. 78
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that that should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ut why starts got further away from us. Interest is a effective learning method to let u...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s got further away from us. Interest is a effective learning method to let us dev...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'apparently', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'still']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.218009478673 0.247107183377 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.175355450237 0.155533422707 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0971563981043 0.0946595960268 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0616113744076 0.0501214627716 123% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0568720379147 0.0437548338989 130% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120853080569 0.122226691241 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0497630331754 0.0403226058552 123% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.71151166265 2.80594681477 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0402843601896 0.0326793684256 123% => OK
Particles: 0.00473933649289 0.00163938923432 289% => OK
Determiners: 0.0687203791469 0.0861772015684 80% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.021327014218 0.021408717616 100% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0284360189573 0.011925033212 238% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2354.0 1933.35771543 122% => OK
No of words: 385.0 316.048096192 122% => OK
Chars per words: 6.11428571429 6.12580529183 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20517956788 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.4 0.374742101984 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.303896103896 0.28420135186 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.223376623377 0.203846283523 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.12987012987 0.137316102897 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71151166265 2.80594681477 97% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.037074148 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623376623377 0.56093040696 111% => OK
Word variations: 77.9297877812 60.7387585426 128% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0891783567 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.3888888889 20.7743622355 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1891646336 49.517814964 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.777777778 127.492653851 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3888888889 20.7743622355 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.555555555556 0.814263465372 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 51.7784992785 49.1944974215 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.32258064516 1.69124875643 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389666034512 0.332605444948 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0676311628258 0.102741220458 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0537833993206 0.0668466124924 80% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.435258623572 0.534860350844 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.167117420177 0.148594505496 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121365144999 0.134430193775 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101868796623 0.0742795772207 137% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.306314237418 0.324371583561 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.032644603064 0.0638462369009 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26213373945 0.228012699653 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818517865722 0.058150111329 141% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.68436873747 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 5.90881763527 135% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.