Some people think that because some children find some subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult so they ought to be optional instead of compulsory. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Subjects like mathematics and philosophy are believed to pose a considerable amount of challenge in students' learning and thus, to some people, they should be made optional. Although I'm quite certain that these subjects are tough, I still incline to the idea that all subjects are equally essential and hence, compulsory.
The fact that some highly-thinking required subjects, mathematics for instance, are proposed to be made non-mandatory lies on their time spent and their usefulness. Since most of the insights are thought to be intricate, they demand so much of the students' cognitive dedication and more of their time to have them solved. This apparently leads to the situation where less time can be shared on other important subjects. Besides, it is very annoying that none of these abstract concepts acquired from these lessons can be put into real life practices. For most people, there is no such thing as applying trigonometric functions or differentiation into producing a tuna, or even coming up with a statistic on excel. Therefore, it is adequately understood why some people wouldn't like to take these subjects and feel that it is better to opt it out from the syllabus.
Since most people are blindfolded with the complexity of these subjects, hardly do they think of why such subjects are included. The actual purpose of making subjects like mathematics and philosophy a must is that is sharpens students logical thinking and organisations of idea. According to experts, students of such fields are anticipated to tackle their problems more rapidly and effectively as they have a laundry list of what to do and when to do. Additionally, such benefits play significantly on the learners' knowledge acquisition speed which means they tend to take in a new lesson much faster compared to those without any logical thinking.
In summary, as the advantages of highly cognitive subjects are vague, people only view their downsides, and therefore want to crop them out of the syllabus. To me, these subjects, just like others, should remain compulsory
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-07 | lolola | 11 | view |
| 2020-05-04 | The Lazy Tiger | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-04 | The Lazy Tiger | 78 | view |
- The tradition of families getting together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 73
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 84
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- Films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 61
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
... they should be made optional. Although Im quite certain that these subjects are t...
^^
Line 3, column 770, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...s adequately understood why some people wouldnt like to take these subjects and feel th...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 508, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'learners'' or 'learner's'?
Suggestion: learners'; learner's
...such benefits play significantly on the learners knowledge acquisition speed which means...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, hence, if, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17261904762 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9186582122 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.966181109 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.142857143 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247706216207 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800955821128 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558734774855 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140650695688 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504145240785 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.