It is clear that the world is facing many environmental issues in the contemporary day. Some people believe that climbing the fuel prices is the prime way to solve these problems. However, from my perspective, this way is ineffective and there are some measures that would be better.
Initially, making the prices of fuel higher does not work. In the past, when petrol prices grew significantly consumers still bought and drove cars as well as factories kept producing and releasing more pollutants. Furthermore, there are a variety of activities that cause pollution such as: deforestation, use of plastic and huge amounts of domestic waste along with fuel consumption is only one of them. Rising petrol prices are unlikely to have any impact on these factors, therefore it can not be the best way to drop the negative impacts to the natural habitats.
Secondly, other better ways should be applied. First of all, it is obvious that investing in green technology along with making eco-friendly sources of energy available and affordable is one of the main contributors to reducing the harmful effect on the environment. Moreover, educating residents the importance of sustainable living as well as enforcing some punishment for whoever has misbehaviors. For instance, chewing gum is banned in Singapore to preserve the environment and doing this can get fined up to 1000 USD.
In conclusion, making the prices of fuel higher and higher is not a good way to reduce the environmental contamination as well as other measures should be considered.
- Some people say that travel helps us to appreciate other cultures How true is this statement Do you think that people who travel a lot appreciate other cultures more than those who stay at home Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant exampl 84
- Some People Think That The Best Way To Solve Environmental Problems Is To Increase The Price Of Petrol 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re some measures that would be better. Initially, making the prices of fuel hig...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ative impacts to the natural habitats. Secondly, other better ways should be ap...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng this can get fined up to 1000 USD. In conclusion, making the prices of fuel...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97638094629 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603174603175 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6269032564 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250260896067 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833465292153 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077208501828 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147072096283 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735421150817 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.