Some people think that big companies should provide sports and social facilities for the local community. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The question of who should pay for recreational facilities in local communities is widely debated. Although some people believe that the private industry should offer these services, I reckon that this is the role of the government.
Some individuals assume businesses should do more to support local communities. Companies, once said, may directly assist people by providing sports and social facilities. Residents will be healthier because of the sports venues, while social amenities will provide community spaces and cultural attractions that will improve people's lives. Businesses, on the other hand, are likely to perceive this as a way to market and may establish facilities only to improve their brand's image.
Personally, I assume that providing recreational facilities should be the responsibility of the government. Facilities that are funded by the government can be commercial and primarily focused on improving the community's standard of living. Businesses' taxes could be used to support these facilities, but the construction and management should be handled by the government. Taxing all local businesses would be more effective than taxing just a few enterprises that provide services. This solution offers society facilities that are paid for by the private sector.
Finally, whether the government or local companies are responsible for the construction of local recreational facilities is a point of contention. Personally, I believe it is better for the government to supply recreational facilities because businesses mostly use them for personal promotion.
- Nowadays some parents put a lot of pressure on their children What is the reason for doing that Is this a positive or negative development for the children 89
- The world should have one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- discuss the pros and cons of learning foreign language 78
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 56
- More and more people are choosing to eat healthy food and making time to exercise regularly Why and what can we do to encourage this 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, may, so, while, i reckon, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 236.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72033898305 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12014057683 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555084745763 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0217970312 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.846153846 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1538461538 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305026522943 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112298638257 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056257455581 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189162844346 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405114005767 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.6 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.