Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To
what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In the last few decades, whether the policy enforcement of car restriction in the major
city is applied or not is an issue that gives rise to endless controversy. Owing to the
negative sides of banning cars in the metropolis, some people argue that the number of
cars should not be restricted in the metropolitan areas. In my opinion, clamping down on
cars brings a variety of benefits for the following reasons: improving well-being and
benefiting the environment.
First and foremost, it seems likely that banning cars in major cities helps to improve
city dwellers’ health. It is often the case that car restrictions offer residents, who usually
sustain a sedentary lifestyle, an opportunity to be in better physical health. These days,
citizens have a tendency to be stuck behind the desk, which might result in a high risk of
obesity. However, shutting off to all cars seems to be an effective solution to this issue.
When any governments apply the enforcement of car restriction, urban dwellers are
encouraged to cycle or walk to school, their workplaces, etc, which enable them to have
a more active lifestyle to reduce the high rate of obesity in major cities. Moreover, it is
generally believed that improving mental illness is one of the significant advantages of
shutting off all cars. There is no doubt that it is a strong link between traffic noise and
depression in adults or asthma attacks in children. Cities, which has turned many of their
streets into car-free walkways and cycleways, are likely to provide residents with higher
air quality, so those who live in the metropolis are offered an opportunity to reduce
respiratory diseases risks. Furthermore, banning cars in dense urban areas tackles noise
pollution and reduces road accidents leading to premature deaths.
More significantly, it is clear that closing off to all non-essential vehicles improves the
quality of residents life. In the first place, it is clear that banning cars converses the
environment. Burning fossil fuels in cars release carbon dioxide, which is the largest
source of greenhouse gas emissions. As these gases build up, they trap heat in the
atmosphere, causing climate change and leading to catastrophic disasters. Evidence is
mounting that vehicle pollution, which includes nitrogen oxides, shoot and carbon
monoxide, is one of the main reasons for global warming, which poses a threat to those
who live in major cities. Furthermore, clamping down on cars also let us radically
reshape the city landscape and make them more people-friendly. In a sprawling city,
space freed up can be repurposed for other activities such as playgrounds, markets and
community events.
Those who are against car restrictions may insist that barring electric vehicles
adversely affects economic development. When cars are restricted, shops and businesses
would be force to close as poor access to them would drive away customers who would
instead visit supermarkets and malls outside the centre. The close of the workplace may
deprive a livelihood of employers and make them unemployed, which puts heavy
pressure on the government’s budget.
To sum up, banning cars in metropolitan is necessary. From what have been
discussed above, shutting off to cars in major city brings several advantages such as
improving well-being and upgrading the quality of inhabitants life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-04 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-04 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-27 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...being and benefiting the environment. First and foremost, it seems likely that...
^^^^
Line 14, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te of obesity in major cities. Moreover, it is generally believed that improving...
^^
Line 22, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...accidents leading to premature deaths. More significantly, it is clear that clo...
^^^^^
Line 30, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re people-friendly. In a sprawling city, space freed up can be repurposed for oth...
^^^
Line 33, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rounds, markets and community events. Those who are against car restrictions m...
^^^^^
Line 40, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pressure on the government’s budget. To sum up, banning cars in metropolitan ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, no doubt, such as, in my opinion, to sum up, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 7.30460921844 329% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 41.998997996 186% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2937.0 1615.20841683 182% => OK
No of words: 540.0 315.596192385 171% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43888888889 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.20363070211 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99706932756 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 303.0 176.041082164 172% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561111111111 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 881.1 506.74238477 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9819215229 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.375 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29166666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 40.0 4.38176352705 913% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211095458644 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600228389125 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579223019 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0439817290448 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508728388842 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 161.0 78.4519038076 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...being and benefiting the environment. First and foremost, it seems likely that...
^^^^
Line 14, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te of obesity in major cities. Moreover, it is generally believed that improving...
^^
Line 22, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...accidents leading to premature deaths. More significantly, it is clear that clo...
^^^^^
Line 30, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re people-friendly. In a sprawling city, space freed up can be repurposed for oth...
^^^
Line 33, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rounds, markets and community events. Those who are against car restrictions m...
^^^^^
Line 40, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pressure on the government’s budget. To sum up, banning cars in metropolitan ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, no doubt, such as, in my opinion, to sum up, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 7.30460921844 329% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 41.998997996 186% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2937.0 1615.20841683 182% => OK
No of words: 540.0 315.596192385 171% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43888888889 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.20363070211 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99706932756 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 303.0 176.041082164 172% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561111111111 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 881.1 506.74238477 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9819215229 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.375 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29166666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 40.0 4.38176352705 913% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211095458644 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600228389125 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579223019 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0439817290448 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508728388842 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 161.0 78.4519038076 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.