Children are tender buds nurturing them is a major responsibility. Also, that is the age when children learn about good and bad thing and think about that how to distinguish them. It is general belief that, juvenile should taught about recycle process of waste at school while other argue that it should have done at home discussion. It is important skill to taught children whether it is taught by teachers or parents.
To commence with, process of recycle has several steps and it should be followed properly to recycle thing from it. While, in developing countries amount of waste are increasing, education of recycle thing taught by teachers in school and at home by parents. Children are tended to follow the rules taught in school because in school mentors train them to how to live in discipline and students have one kind of fear that if they do not follow the rules they would punish. So, they learn quickly and in good way. Furthermore, in school educator have a proper model and demonstration video which, teach children how to recycle and children mind enough mature that by watching visualization they learn in better way. A good example of this is teacher taught them how to recycle cloth that not in further use by making bag or shelter for animal outside the home.
On the other hand, rest of the time from the school children are at home and spend time with their family and we can say that first school of children is home and mentors are their parents. So, it is good thing that parents encourage them to learn new skills like recycle process and many more. Moreover, it is believed that children are first heard any advice from their parents and obey them. Recycle material also is concerned topic for environment it should be discussed in family discussion. For example, at the dinner time when the children and parents having dinner together at time parents should put this topic and spread awareness about this among with children.
In conclusion, although taught about recycle material at school to children is good thing, In my point of view it is more affected when this topic discuss more in family topic when children and parents sit together and share their opinion about it.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart andgraph below give information about participants who have enteredthe Olympics since it began Summarise the information by selecting and reporting on the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows the results of a 20 year study into why adults in the UK attend arts events Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet Do you agree or disagree 56
- The pie chart below shows the percentage of households income distributed in different categories 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ether and share their opinion about it.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80628272251 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37504246946 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44502617801 0.561755894193 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3148657686 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37496686503 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128085096948 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076655608826 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248263336964 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336606272436 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.