Some people think that children should receive formal training at school on how to be good parents in the future. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is sometimes argued that skills and knowledge to become good parents need to be formally imparted to children at school. While the transmission of these kinds of knowledge is beneficial for a child in some certain respects, I disagree with this view and believe that children should highly concentrate on their education rather than learning about adult matters.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that schools should be held accountable for educating children to become good parents at the early age. Primarily, thanks to parenting lessons, students will be more conscientious of parenting tasks if they were adults, hence a better understanding of their parents. This might result in bridging the generation gap between parents and children. In addition, students may have a good grasp of adult issues such as raising and educating their kids in a proper way, thereby overcoming adversities in parenthood at ease.
On the other hand , it would be wrong to reject the arguments which contend that it is inappropriate and unrealistic for children be instilled in parental responsibilities at their age. One argument is that students are not mature enough to acquire matters with regard to parenting skills. They cannot fully comprehend the definition and meaning of becoming parents when they are too young. Another justification is that rather than the learning of becoming good parents, children are in need of helpful knowledge which assisting their study and future career. Such skills as presentation or teamwork are more pragmatic and of paramount importance for the development and education of students.
In conclusion, I disagree with the view in favour of formal trainings at schools for children to become good parents in the future.
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full-time and part-time students about its services of IT support and current opening hours. 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and repoting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther than learning about adult matters. On the one hand, it is undeniable that s...
^^^
Line 2, column 482, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...uch as raising and educating their kids in a proper way, thereby overcoming adversities in pare...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... parenthood at ease. On the other hand , it would be wrong to reject the argumen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, so, still, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91432350527 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546428571429 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3467006455 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316575291647 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127962627419 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106282849099 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245777499475 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0949065183129 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.