Some people think that communication by using computers and phones will have negative effects on young people's writing and reading skills. Do you agree or disagree?
With the plethora of high-tech devices, people are gradually switching from book reading and paper writing habit to texting using these new gadgets. Some argue that such a development will deliver negative impacts on the young’s abilities to read and write. In my opinion, I believe that communication via computers and phones could have both good and bad influences on individuals’ writing and reading skills.
To begin with, it is true that new electronic devices are causing detrimental changes in the way young people read and write. Since computers allow users to compose emails with an automatic correction system, individuals no longer have to care about the spelling and grammar in their writing. In the long term, young people will lose the awareness of correcting their own paperwork when it comes to paper-delivered exams or traditional letters, which will massively confuse the readers. Moreover, because texting on mobile phones is absolutely convenient, people tend to spend a huge amount of time communicating with as many acquaintances as possible during the day. As a result, the young do not have enough time to read and thus, their reading skill will be deteriorated.
However, with proper use of these modern gadgets, young people still can improve their reading and writing abilities. Firstly, if individuals do not rely too much on auto-correction, they can still be aware of their mistakes. Because such a function is designed to be easily turned on or off, balancing the use of this system could maintain the competence of good writing. Secondly, computers and smartphones offer a way to access unlimited information online, users’ reading skill will be improved if they take this advantage rather than wasting these devices for communication purpose only.
In conclusion, I believe that communication by using computers and phones could bring both benefits and bad effects on the young’s writing and reading skills.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-08-31 | drtruong92 | 92 | view |
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 47
- Some people think that advertising aimed at children should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some experts opine that a new language should be introduced for all countries for international communication Do you think the benefits of introducing a new international language will outweigh the problems 88
- some people think that large international sporting events only brings drawbacks, and that it is not worth hosting them.Do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, thus, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35483870968 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97896894636 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574193548387 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6244432591 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.692307692 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9230769231 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422292051176 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151748526644 0.084324248473 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909798834322 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288182315668 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829635341887 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.