Some people think that couples should live together before getting married to start knowing each other better and see if they are compatible. Others say that because of this tendency people become immoral and only deep emotional attachment makes a durable alliance. What is your opinion?
Marriage has always been considered as the most responsible act uniting lives of two different persons. Some individuals believe that partners ought to dwell before the official ceremony in order to discover more about the lover and confirm that both are congruent. I believe that in most cases living together before marriage has many advantages and I will explain my point of you in the following essay.
Firstly, I am convinced that this phase can prevent discord and divorces in the long run. Couples receive a chance to test their compatibility in day-to-day routine. Certain things definitely can not be revealed during the dating period so that twosome will examine conformity in all possible ways. For instance, seven years ago I suggested to my boyfriend to move at my place to be confident we can stand each others’ patterns and habits. However, this attempt failed after a few months. Therefore, a “trial period” of the cohabitation serves unstable relationships to end rather sooner than later.
Moreover, finance related topics are another motive to ponder. During the dating stage the pair usually feels shy regarding discussing any crucial subjects related to money. If the significant others pay all bills in the restaurants it doesn’t prove they will ensure full financial support all along the family life. Based on russian statistics, a quarter of families’ breakdowns occur due to economic disagreements. Hence, the benefit-sharing stage allows to avoid considerable miscommunications in the future.
Taking everything into consideration, before the final decision about the wedding beloved ones should experience communal life to verify their alliance render them both enhanced.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
| 2020-07-18 | katenokk84 | 78 | view |
| 2020-02-24 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 81 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
- The arts including art music and theatre are considered to be important in society Do you think the arts still have a place amongst our modern lifestyles Should the arts be included in the school curriculum 78
- These days an increasing number of people are leaving rural areas to live in the city Discuss some of the effects of rural depopulation migration from the country to the city and suggest some ways in which this trend could be reversed 73
- It is much more convenient to watch a movie on television or computer than buy a ticket and go to the cinema. In the nearest future the popularity of cinemas will drastically decline.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- Many scientists and linguists predict that all people will choose to speak the same global language in the future How far do you agree or disagree with this prediction Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... before marriage has many advantages and I will explain my point of you in the fo...
^^
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...evealed during the dating period so that twosome will examine conformity in all p...
^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... any crucial subjects related to money. If the significant others pay all bills in...
^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'avoiding'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: avoiding
...Hence, the benefit-sharing stage allows to avoid considerable miscommunications in the f...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, for instance, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45488721805 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94094791322 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.725563909774 0.561755894193 129% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5161309204 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105977465419 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0268415052458 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246417476195 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0524463658269 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177865236615 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.