Some people think that detailed descriptions of crime scenes in newspapers and on TV can have a bad influence on the public so this kind of information should be restricted in the media To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people think that detailed descriptions of crime scenes in newspapers and on TV can have a bad influence on the public, so this kind of information should be restricted in the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many people argue that the public can be negatively affected by detrimental information from detailed descriptions of crime scenes in printed newspapers and on television; therefore, this should be limited in the media. I completely agree with this notion since it gives rise to criminal acts, people’s anxiety and against the morality of propaganda in transmitting information

The first reason for my view that crimes should not be reported cursory is because it encourages viewers to violate the laws. Young people or even children nowadays use the internet as their main method of collecting information. Everyday in social media, more and more articles relating to killings, robberies or kidnaping appear, which will raise curiosity and impulse them to act the same.
Another justification for why I oppose the detailed presentation of crimes via the mass media is that members of the public’s anxiety can be triggered. Detailed descriptions of crime scenes may lead to excessive panic and anxiety for people especially those with weak mentality. They may become anti-society, unwilling to connect with others. They are always fear of being the victim of a potential crime.As a result, it could lead to not only a loose-knit community where people are not willing to support those in need but also a burden for the government.

Last but not least, detailed descriptions of crime scenes in newspapers and on TV against the morality of propaganda in transmitting information. In the morality of propaganda, journalists or television directors must avoid as much as they can about the contents which included violence actions, especially about the process that crimes occurred. But nowadays, it appears more and more to attract the attention of people. Last but not least, detailed descriptions of crime scenes may not be highly appreciated by other people or foreign media outlets. A newspaper that has a strong connection with cases like killings, robberies or kidnappings will be the cause of adverse effects on both tourism and the economy. Tourists feel fear of visiting this country for fear of being victimized in these crimes and many foreign companies will hesitate in investing into the country with such a chaotic society.
In conclusion, I strongly oppose the idea of presenting detailed crime reports on newspapers and television due to its negative impact on the public. It is advisable that the details of the crimes should be completely banned and Journalists or television directors should make a wise choice when publishing the news in order to create a better society, repel crimes and unite people.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-11-14 Giang Tran 78 view
Essays by user Giang Tran :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 407, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...f being the victim of a potential crime.As a result, it could lead to not only a l...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e country with such a chaotic society. In conclusion, I strongly oppose the ide...
^^^
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the crimes should be completely banned and Journalists or television directors ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2214.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 421.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25890736342 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89465185669 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517814726841 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 695.7 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.647060582 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.375 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3125 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303836217463 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105224192527 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916953894957 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182592803403 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834087968296 0.056905535591 147% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.