Some people think that, give woman the same roles to make in military or polices forces. But some other people think that, it not for woman.
Some people believed that, woman should have the same position to man in polices forces or military. However, people believe this work not suitable for woman. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of should give woman the same roles to make in the military defense. First, work for government or anywhere are believed to equalize job opportunities among human regardless of their family background or their sex. This job support, presumably tends not only to increase the overall employment of people but also mitigated woman’s feeling of inferiority, which eventually promotes an egalitarian society. Second, genders equality at work probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and knowledgeable human capital is imperative decide if they are allowed to work or not. This give to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, woman can have the same roles to man in military or polices still have some disadvantages. First, offering all people working in military would likely correspond with woman’s health on a country. If woman had the same roles as men in the police forces, they would work like man even hard jobs. Second, give female the same position to make in military would have many different kinds of work in military, including carrying heavy bags and going long distances to exercise or hold a gun weighing nearly three to four kilograms, thereby health burdens for military and govern or polices staff and potentially wasting time that these women could have spent pursuing more suitable career paths. It, instead, would be a more job viable option if the resources were focused on supporting woman have hoppy participate in military.
I were discussed both sides of the argument. In my perspective, government in any nations need to improve working equality across the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-09 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
- Every day millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening And how can we solve this problem 78
- Many companies sponsor sports as a way to advertise themselves Some people think this is good for the world of sports Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The graph show the price of bananas in 4 different countries from 1996 to 2004 74
- The graphs show the number of internationally travellers to three different regions in a European country during five years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people say in order to prevent illness and disease government should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problem To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...position to make in military would have many different kinds of work in military, including ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 3, Rule ID: PERS_PRONOUN_AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: Did you mean 'was'?
Suggestion: was
... have hoppy participate in military. I were discussed both sides of the argument. I...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23692307692 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7183078621 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590769230769 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.7766985912 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330434742169 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113916809775 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121332452129 0.0667982634062 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189099714912 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116794741026 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.