Some people think government should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems to help people prevent illness and disease. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Illness and disease are always the problems which any governments need to concerne because these problems impact on citizens’ health. Some people argue that if government focus on reducing environmental pollution as well as housing issues, disease and illness can be prevented. Personally, I partly agree with the opinion.
With regard to the positiveness of the matter, there are some benefits of reducing environmental pollution and housing issues. As for the former, if governments carry out many practical solutions to protect environment such as constructing more green fields in cities and decreasing the number of vehicles traveling on streets, these ways will make the air be cleaner and fresher. Therefore, people can prevent illness caused by polluted air. For example, those who live in a clean country such as Singapore tend to less get sick caused by dirty air, compared to other countries which are less clean than it. The other point needs to be considered is that if housing issues are solved, this will help to prevent illness and disease. Indeed, if there are more houses in countries, residents will have more spaces to live. Therefore, people will not concentrate at some points that can cause infection if some people get infectious disease.
Besides protecting residents’ health by dealing with pollution and housing trouble, governments can do more difference ways to improve the health of their citizens. The first one is that governments can do useful propagandas about doing exercise which brings a lot of merits for people’s health. What is more, residents need to be aware of keeping their health by themselves before governments can do anything to help them. For instance, those who often go to gym have good health and they are not easy to get common sick such as fever or snivel.
In conclusion, I tend to partly agree with the opinion that people can prevent illness and disease if governments focus on resolving environmental pollution and housing issues.
- Instead of trying to prevent climate change, people should find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Instead of trying to prevent climate change, people should find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Instead of trying to prevent climate change, people should find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problemsTo what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, what is more, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21913580247 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83331820378 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9413530611 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.733333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352114550125 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133474790427 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106124880204 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250646798971 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726506559803 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.