Some people think that government should give finacnial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Other believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Governments giving financial support to creative artists such as musicians, singers, and painters has a major topic of concern in modern society. While some people agree with this idea, I believe that authorities should take other actions and measures to help them.
On the one hand, various reasons explain why the authorities should fund talented artists. Firstly, various unknown artists have taken advantage of their talents, such as nature skills, and experience acknowledges, to make valuable artworks and songs. These represent culture, heritage, and history and serve to educate people about the city, and act as landmarks or talking points for visitors and tourists. Furthermore, Many artists have a true passion for making their own communities a better place to live through their artwork. Therefore, without financial support, their efforts can hurt their attempts to make things better for their own life.
It seems to me that government should concentrate on other sources, such as infrastructure, and the assistance of non-government. Various artists can gain the huge attention of the public by using the multimedia platform. Due to the mass usage of apps by youth, companies showcase their brands through artists to increase their income. Nevertheless, infrastructure also plays an essential role in attracting visitors, therefore, the government should use its budgets wisely as there are many other crucial structures to look after by the authorities. And finally, artists who do a job like other professionals should earn their own money by selling their masterpieces and voice without being dependent on a pension, compensate.
In conclusion, there are good reasons why artists should rely on alternative sources of financial support, but in my opinion, government helps are sometimes necessary.
- The chart and table below give information about what nursing graduates did after finishing their course in the UK in 2009
- n increasing number of advertisement on TV aim at children What are the effects of television advertisement SHould televison advertisements be controlled 56
- The diagram shows the different stages in the production of woolen goods 78
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks 61
- Many people use distance learning programmes study material post TV the Internet to study at home but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefits of attending colleagues or university To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52329749104 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92544706257 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634408602151 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1165770323 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.538461538 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311411301956 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104096241646 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735332590202 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207106736911 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808925172012 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52329749104 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92544706257 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634408602151 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1165770323 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.538461538 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311411301956 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104096241646 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735332590202 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207106736911 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808925172012 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.