There is an irrefutable fact that the construction of city infrastructures, particularly public libraries has become a topic of interest. While many city dwellers hold the view that these libraries should be established more for serving residents, others reckon that it is an imprudent policy due to the technological breakthrough. In this essay, both viewpoints will be discussed and my favour of the latter.
The most convincing reason why local official states should invest in free libraries for bookaholics is its contribution to developing the city in various fields. This is because when residents are free to access an enormous amount of books in different types, they are facilitated to acquire a huge amount of practical and precious knowledge playing an integral role in their personal needs as well as city growth. Therefore, these book lovers will become a determinant in the backbone of city sustainable development. For example, business or commercial books are an important source of practical knowledge related to economy that are useful for economic students who will become potential entrepreneurs for their living hometowns.
However, it is my belief that the local coffers should be spent on other fields instead of public libraries due to two following reasons. The most notable one is the popularity of personal digital devices. In fact, at least each citizen in the cities have their own digital devices which are portable and effortlessly access to the Internet with an affordable price. Therefore, people can read digital books without charge via various virtual platforms such as Wattpad or BookBub instead of struggling to visit the conventional libraries in order to find their favourite paper books. Another reason is the necessity of spending local coffers in reckoning other domestic problems. This means instead of constructing public libraries in earnest, it is a worthwhile investment when domestic governments allot the local coffers in policies and campaigns that are indispensable to a sustainable development of their cities. For example, the local official states should mobilise sponsors and ordinary citizens to take part in a long- lasting campaign that contributes to pushing for a greener future by raising awareness about single used items, collecting garbage and planting trees. Moreover, tax revenue should be prudently spent on improving traffic infrastructures and facilitating underprivileged children to free educational policies to improve citizen’s living quality.
In conclusion, while many advocates are inclined to the fact that the local development is attributable to the ubiquity of free libraries, I am convinced that this is an imprudent policy due to its practical fields and effectiveness.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: adamneyul
Essay Categories
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2340.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 424.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51886792453 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07990243259 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549528301887 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 735.3 506.74238477 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.3305274211 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.25 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140898020258 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469448934664 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300910181317 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864265808281 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340467497826 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.