Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.
To what extent do you agree with this view?
These days, despite the revolution in terms of human civilization which makes the world to shift her attention to technology and other sectors, I will disagree with the notion of government relinquishing art to the background and spending on another sector.
First, art is life. Art deals with the inner mind of people coupled with their creativity ability in producing a result beyond reasoning. Art helps humans in reasoning and viewing the world and scenario through another perspective. Relinquishing this to the background through the government action signifies that their creative ability is no longer of no use and appreciated. Art entails music, drawing, writing, sculptures and many others.
Secondly, art centres serve as museums which bring foreigners and visitors for learning and recreation. Some countries of the world finance the country's economy or state finance through the revenue generated at the art centres. It opens the location and centres for both foreign and local business transactions, thereby curbing the rate of unemployment in the country.
Furthermore, art helps in knowing the cultural background of a particular ethnic group or tribe. Art helps the new generation in having an in-depth knowledge of their tribes. For example, the Benin Kingdom art work, the Great Pyramid in Egypt both helps the citizens know and have more knowledge of their tribe and nation's history.
In conclusion, art unites the soul of men through various mediums. Human loves their products being valued and taken in high regards, thus government recognizing and developing talents in the world of art will be of added advantage to the country as well as a huge morale boost for the present art men and women.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Molor-Od | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | poomoak | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | Sai sushma | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | olimilove | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | lucastang00 | 61 | view |
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.To what extent do you agree with this view? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29710144928 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76613291137 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590579710145 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4436918914 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.428571429 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143564279418 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498918081325 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280312358516 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764123079644 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405455388938 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.