Some people think that governments should give financial support
to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe
that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is general controversy on whether governments should provide proficient creators with fiscal support. Although some people advocate the view, others argue that talented artists should be given funding from substitute supporters. Both sides of this argument will be analyzed before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
On the one hand, it can not be denied that artistic works play a necessary and important role in the development and reputation of a country. In fact, most of the tourists are usually attracted by unique masterpieces or some great and popular products of art like the Statue of Liberty in USA or the picture of Mona Lisa in France. This would lead to the growth of national service industry and tourism. Also, those works of art such as songs, pictures or statues represent the culture, people and heritage of a nation, which could impress considerably others from all around the world. Without people who create such excellent products, those achievements could hardly happen. This is the reason why the government should pay the local creators for encouraging them to produce many products that make their country more attractive and popular.
On the other hand, there are several reasons why some people are against the financial support of the government for creative artists. One probable reason is that the national budget should be spent on some more vital concerns such as education, healthcare and security. There would be a larger amount of funding given to those who are musicians or painters than that provided for public services, while it is much more important and essential to educate, take care of and secure the citizens than to create some famous artistic products. Moreover, creators of art and earn a lot of money by selling their works or from their exhibitions. This means that they can produce some great products without being funded by the government.
In summary, both side of the argument regarding government funding for creative artists have strong supporting ideas. After looking these two opposing points of view, I am better convinced that the artist should rely on alternative sources because other areas of a country are more more in need of the financial support from the government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-16 | minhchau2205 | 78 | view |
- Some people think that governments should give financial supportto creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believethat creative artists should be funded by alternative sources.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in millions of telephone calls in Finland divided into three categories from 1995 2004 87
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in millions of telephone calls in Finland divided into three categories from 1995 2004 76
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland, divided into three categories, from 1995 – 2004. 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland, divided into three categories, from 1995 – 2004. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he other hand, there are several reasons why some people are against the financia...
^^
Line 6, column 330, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...larger amount of funding given to those who are musicians or painters than that provide...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rgument regarding government funding for creative artists have strong supporting ...
^^
Line 8, column 279, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: more
...es because other areas of a country are more more in need of the financial support from t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 279, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'more' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: more
...es because other areas of a country are more more in need of the financial support from t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, moreover, regarding, so, while, in fact, in summary, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17213114754 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59437559642 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551912568306 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4064270271 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.3125 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288529696199 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916640740159 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707036742582 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195991613644 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546928180268 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.