Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources.
Recently, raising funds for creative artists has become an ongoing topic of debate in many parts of the world. It is a common belief that spending money for painters or musicians is the business of governments. However, there is a more persuasive argument that creative work should be helped in funding by various sources except for the governments for several reasons.
On the one hand, artworks play indispensable roles for each country because they fuel the culture, heritage, and history through statues, sculptures, traditional songs, or paints. Specifically, artistic fields are considered as features which help to form the state effectively. Indeed, in terms of tourism, showing off the man-made products following conventional ways is the direct way to express artistic charms to visitors. For example, museums or art exhibitions are full of hustle and bustle every day. It is due to the fact that people always give more value to art fields whenever they can pay a visit to any country to broaden ones’ horizons and solve lots of long-term questions at hand about how to make and the sense of artistic works throughout history.
Nevertheless, using money funding by other kinds of organizations is a better way to enhance and promote the development of the industry as well as living conditions for citizens. It fosters alternative sources by purchasing some creative products to help artists earn money like other jobs and avoid being unemployed people. Moreover, governments have to give more stress on many community’ concerns consisting of education, healthcare, infrastructure, and security instead of paying too much on artworks. In fact, adults and adolescents can set aside time to enjoy creative products unless governments can meet their requirements on a daily basis.
To sum up, while it is apparent paying money for art fields is one way by which governments can sustain culture as well as history, it is undeniable that funds from alternative organizations can assume even greater significance in the process of boosting works of creators. I suggest that because the 4.0 Industry has transformed modern lifestyle in many ways, artists should pay a great deal of effort to retain the symbol of heritage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-23 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | killashaw | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | oyinmartha | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | Friezzy | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 67
- The line graph compares the percentage of people in three countries who used the Internet between 1999 and 2009 60
- The table below gives information about student enrolment at Bristol University in 1928 1958 and 2008 84
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that t 84
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, except for, for example, in fact, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22284122563 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92275031601 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601671309192 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.0460876645 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.928571429 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6428571429 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265652735862 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843337400289 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708935629019 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159080476493 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701990162763 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.