Some people think that governments should spend as much money as possible exploring outer space (for example, traveling to the Moon and to other planets). However, others disagree and think governments should spend this money on our basic needs on Earth. Discuss both these views, and give your own opinion
At the present time, aerospace is proceeding rapidly to satisfy the desire of conquering outer space. Nonetheless, some people assume that money should be spent on fundamental needs on Earth. From my point of view, I am inclined to believe that investment in astronomy is potentially essential for the future of humanity.
Human civilization is facing life-threatening problems that are currently unsolvable. Global population is increasing at an alarming rate, leading to lack of living conditions. Family planning is not taken seriously alongside scientific breakthroughs raising life expectancy, which results in population overgrowth. Illiteracy is another concern as children in Africa have little access to education. The degradation of facilities as well as the unavailability of teachers have deterred students from going to school. On a global scale, poverty, hunger and pandemics have posed a threat to the existence of humanity. It is vitally important that governments should invest in basic needs to provide a better life for global citizens.
On the other hand, space exploration is believed to pave the way for the future of human beings. Scientists are conducting space research in order to find an alternate living space for the human world in the far future. On top of that, the exploration of the universe may be the solution to the problems that are unsolved for the time being. In sight of future benefits, space exploration is a stepping stone to the existence of humans.
To draw a fair conclusion, both solutions are equally pivotal, nonetheless, life on Earth has yet to show any improvement but on a downfall, with the recent outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, aerospace is expected to be a solution to current issues, with companies recently investing in this field, namely SpaceX by Ellon Musk.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, as well as, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29109589041 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05639700889 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606164383562 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6369544759 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.5625 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169248992173 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504369665516 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678289098108 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929985246031 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054920711287 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.