International sports events are likely to earn a large number of followers all around the world, thus, are prone to controversies, one of which is whether or not hosting one benefits the country. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the matter and give my final verdict afterward.
There are grounds that are in favor of hosting a sporting event on a global scale in terms of national growth. The prospect that an international event is held may be an effective booster of the country's tourism, given that people from all around the world would be interested in the future event. The rise in tourist numbers can account for a good occasion from which the locals can earn their living, as there is expectedly an upsurge in demands in the area. Generally speaking, the host country may witness a growth in the national economy as their inhabitants' living conditions are improved during and after the event.
Oppositions to the idea that a country should host an international sporting event may lie in the negative potential for the country's budget and the local environment. First of all, the chosen country cannot afford global-scale sports games given their economic status. Indeed, a country should be well-prepared concerning infrastructure, that is worldwide standardized, prior to the event. This could be a waste of money and effort since the facility would mostly be abandoned after the event, owing to the fact that any national event may not need that big-sized a stadium or cutting-edge equipment. Not only does this account for poor budgeting, the issue also puts a strain on the local surroundings. Unused sports arenas can become a favorable hub for carriers of contagious diseases, such as malaria. Besides, the considerable amount of waste may accompany the sudden growth in the number of tourists, leaving the area much bigger land sites and thus, turning the local life upside down. On the whole, hosting an international event might do more harm than good to a developing country, as they are bound to invest a fortune to prepare and unable to use the invested infrastructure once the event is ended.
In conclusion, it can only be beneficial for a country to take charge of an international sports event, when the country is developed already to meet the strikingly high requirements for a host country. Therefore, I am of the opinion that only developed countries should host global sporting events.
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 73
- Research into new types of medicine and treatments are essential for improving health and dealing with diseases Who do you think should fund this research private companies individuals or governments 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...tional sports events are likely to earn a large number of followers all around the world, thus, a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...prone to controversies, one of which is whether or not hosting one benefits the country. In th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2030.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83696800972 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527093596059 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.7897867823 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.875 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265474766405 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090580124496 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589748190858 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172747976516 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409094965821 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.