Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country,
while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
It is asserted by some people that conducting an international sports event will benefit the host country. However, critics say that those events would be a waste of budget and should be better spent. Despite the evident merits it brings to the society, I would concur with the latter notion for the profound drawbacks of large sport festivals.
For one thing, such events provide opportunities for the country to enhance the image of cultural identity. From a cultural perspective, sports aspirants around the globe as well as domestic visitors will gather to join in the dynamic environment with high sporting spirit. This is especially advantageous for the locals to uphold their value, given the opportunities to advertise and sell traditional commodities and cuisines. Tourists in turn will have a deeper insight on the beauty of their region and thus, this promotes acculturism to spread more widely.
For another, the shortcomings are subtle which wield perennial negative influence on the host nation in the long run. Firstly, the cost for maintaining sport amenities is substantial in comparison with the profit derived from ticketing. The investment in sports facilities aimed at professional athletes is deemed a financial constraint and a pressing problem for the authorities given the vast amount of the equipment are only used temporarily. The disparities between the turnover and resources allocated is considered as national loans, which the chosen country will have to endure for years later. Furthermore, with the massive number of tourists across the globe combined in a region, this could give rise to potential infectious diseases which exert adverse health impacts on the public. For instance, the proportion of Covid-19 patients has risen significantly in Korea after the Olympic games ended. This will weigh more on the medical system of the host when the pandemics break out due to the uncontrolled number of spectators assembling in one particular place provoking the spread of diseases.
To conclude, regardless of the existing cultural benefits, I still hold the opinion that those could be facilitated by other ways. Nonetheless, the downsides are more considerable, requiring additional attention to be resolved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-02 | tramngochg | 73 | view |
- In the past most people worked for small businesses while more people now work for large businesses What are the advantages and disadvantages of working for large businesses 84
- Some countries spend a lot of money preparing competitors in major sports competitions such as the Olympic Games and football World Cup Others say it is better to spend money encouraging children to take up sports at a young age To what extent do you agre 84
- Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside Do you agree or disagree 89
- Research shows that consumers are less and less influenced by tv and newspaper advertisements than in the past Why is this happening Is it a positive or negative development 96
- Some people think the main purpose of school is to turn children into good citizens and workers rather than to benefit them as individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, still, thus, well, for instance, as well as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42165242165 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92491181587 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612535612536 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1621245092 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.9375 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170037244008 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545699890786 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774635049243 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096755996277 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668966564052 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.