Some people think that hosting international sports events is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
In recent years, there is an ongoing debate on hosting international sports events among people. Many adopt a view that this kind of event will bring about many outstanding advantages while some people consent to the opposite view. Personally speaking, I share the same opinion with the former idea. This essay will present an analysis of the given issue as well as to draw a logical conclusion.
On the one hand, there are some notable downsides with reference to hosting an international sports event. A budget required to handle such a large event like that leads to pecuniary problems. To be more specific, governments have to invest money in purchasing modern sports facilities, refurbishing stadium ‘s seating for spectators and indeed, guaranteeing transportation and hotels for both participants and audiences. All of these issues will cost up to a big fortune, which may place a burden on the governments, especially for those developing countries. To cite an example, the Olympic Tokyo 2020 taking place during the harsh summer of Japan has forced the organizers to expend in finding a practical solution to solve the heatstroke that occurred to almost every staff at the event. As a result, Japan anticipated to spend around $15.4 billion but the true total spending excessively went up an unimaginable amount of $20 billion.
On the other hand, despite several drawbacks, being a host country in an international sports event creates a host of outstanding opportunities for that nation. Firstly, it will attract tourists who are sports fan from different countries as well as becoming the main attention of the world. That is to say, this chance acts as a tourism marketing strategy to the home country, thereby boosting the turnover from tourism to the possible highest level. Secondly, this kind of event also strengthens the fellowship between all the participating nations. Therefore, they can develop a better cooperation in other key areas such as education and economy. Last but not least, each sports athlete is able to widen their horizons by meeting new people and show their patriotism through winning medals.
To conclude, with lots of aforementioned benefits, I strongly believe that hosting international sports events engender a myriad of chances for the host country even though there are also some significant complications that should be bargained for beforehand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | nle.hngoc | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | llrasthy J | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | Kiwi | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | Kiwi | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | hi.nguyn91 | 89 | view |
- Today TV channels provide men s sport shows more than women s sport shows why Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 89
- Some people think that it is good to be ambitious How important is it to be ambitious Do you think it s a good characteristic 84
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organisation Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your 89
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...tion. Firstly, it will attract tourists who are sports fan from different countries as ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, as for, as to, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, with reference to, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25260416667 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92269535981 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622395833333 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2431908345 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.647058824 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5882352941 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6470588235 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273420848735 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758379331953 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776080792554 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170437592304 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381015349497 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.