Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is appreciated that the effort to protect wild animals is costly and time-consuming, and it could have been better made to do humankind good. From my perspective, I truly agree with this statement.
There are several drawbacks of allocating budgets to saving wild animals in terms of their potential threats to humans and waste of money. Initially, an overwhelming danger is that wild animals can carry diseases dangerous or fatal to humans. This is derived from the fact that wild species, such as tigers, are found to harbor parasites, such as intestinal worms and protozoa. Another dangerous factor is that wild animals can attack people by biting or scratching, resulting in unwanted injuries. Besides, in order to aid wild species with suitable complex behavioral, social, nutritional, and psychological needs, a tremendous amount of expenditure is required.
By contrast, spending time and money on people greatly benefits upgrading and expanding transportation infrastructure and finding methods to tackle adversely infectious diseases. To begin with, due to the fact that transport ensures the everyday mobility of people and contributes to the production and distribution of goods, the transportation network is indispensable to the well-functioning of economic activities and a key to ensuring social well-being and cohesion of populations. Infectious illnesses, moreover, can be passed from individual to individual, even leading to hazardous pandemics, notably the Covid pandemic. Therefore, it is urgent to discover cures and vaccines for these diseases. Therefore, devoting time and budget to transportation systems and medical researches would be advantageous to people.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned explanations, my verdict is that humans should be prioritized over protecting wild animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-03 | abid1 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | mynguyen001 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Linhdung | 73 | view |
- In most parts of the world the volume of traffic is growing at an alarming rate In the form of an assignment discuss the main traffic problems in your country their causes and possible solutions 89
- Some people think that parents have a great influence on their children Others believe that the media is a bigger influence Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Many people say that cooking and eating healthily is better for individuals health than consuming ready meals To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The table shows the changing value which China achieved by exporting five types of goods over the two years of 2009 and 2010 measured in billion dollars 10
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, moreover, so, therefore, well, as for, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73529411765 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33434601111 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628676470588 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9203697396 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260183018133 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797082797678 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482794705608 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150957193745 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603083330419 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.