As country develops, a large population chooses to live individually or live in a small family unit. Discuss the causes and its effects on society.
Along with the development of a nation, many citizens opt for residing individually or in small groups. This essay will indicate some explanations for this phenomenon with its impact on the community.
From my perspective, the roots of this development can be attributed to two principal reasons. Initially, a large population chooses to live individually or live in a small family unit to cut down on the costs of living. For instance, there was only one breadwinner in charge of earning money in an extended family in the past, which often resulted in an overwhelming financial burden. Individuals who live on their own or in a small family unit can more easily satisfy their own and others’ demands with their wages in the present day. Avoiding conflicts between family members is another main explanation. As the size of a family and the number of people in the family minimalise, so do the potential arguments and rivalries between members of the family.
This trend has both positive and negative impacts on the community. In terms of merit, it might be a driving force behind national economic development. This is derived from the fact that the amount of money made by an individual now may be used to support fewer people compared to the past, leading to higher GDP, which is an indispensable criterion to evaluate the development of an economy. By contrast, on account of living apart from families and relatives, this trend can act as a deterrent to the sustainability of the family bond. Some people, especially youngsters, would not be embraced in the love of their families; therefore, they might suffer from loneliness or mental disorders, even committing suicide
In conclusion, decreasing the living costs and staying away from family arguments suggests why a considerable amount of citizens opt for residing individually or in small groups, and this phenomenon has both constructive and adverse effects on society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-29 | lennie.butera | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | lennie.butera | 73 | view |
- More companies have opened working areas without walls or barriers on their desks Do the disadvantages of open plan offices outweigh the advantages 84
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people think that governments should do more to make their citizens eat a healthy diet Others however believe that individuals must take responsibility for their own diet and health Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tive and adverse effects on society.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, so, therefore, apart from, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1320754717 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95999993586 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550314465409 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 94.2434214426 49.4020404114 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.538461538 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273097105022 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963412099523 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122052512854 0.0667982634062 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157603900746 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865487261511 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.