The bad circumstance of biodiversity has become a widespread concern in recent years. There is an opinion that governments should spend a huge amount of money on preserving wild animals. However, I disagree with the idea given, because it is possible to exploit resources intelligently to benefit both animals and the human population.
The animal conservation project has been highly prioritized in many countries. The first convincing reason is the number of species that appear in the red list increase every year. If the extinction of flora and fauna continues, the survival of humans can be threatened. For example, if the hunt of whales cannot be prevented, the ocean ecosystems will be changed in a negative trend, this may affect the seafood sources on which the communities, especially the fishermen depend for a living. Next, protecting wild animals means protecting their habitats of like rainforests and oceans. If not, climate change will alter our food supplied when overpopulation still continues. Therefore, there will be a shortage of food unless they solve this problem as soon as possible.
On the other hand, money should be spent on the welfare of humankind, certainly. First of all, the poverty and homelessness rates in many undeveloped and developing countries have increased dramatically. Let alone many lives are in difficult circumstances and now facing death because of starvation and disease. For that reason, the authorities should aid the funds for the underprivileged to overcome adversity and improve the lives of residents. Secondly, wild animals maybe the most compelling reason for the decrease in agriculture. They eat crops or also leave pathogens on plants, which reduce the quantity and efficiency of agricultural products. Last but not least, people establish ecotourism destinations in order to prevent endangered species from poaching, but its purpose is not only that. The responsibility of this is creating more jobs for the people such as biotechnology or environment protection industry.
In conclusion, it is necessary to protect wild animals. However, people should keep balancing the resources allocated for society and wildlife
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45427728614 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07742717794 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634218289086 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8577107682 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.45 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.95 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212068158626 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543605154834 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532303829759 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116774835912 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299065719044 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.