A highly controversial issue today relates to whether to supporting the relationship between enterprises and traditions from all over the world or not. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both points of view and then give my own opinion on the matter.
On the side of the argument there are people who argue that the benefits of increasing organization and traditional value considerably outweigh its disadvantages for not only society but also cultures. The main reason for believing this is that if multinational companies increasingly expand their businesses in a country, they will offer a large number of job opportunities for local residents. Therefore, this trend leads to unemployment rate being reduced as well as the standard of living being improved. It is also possible to say that by this way, local companies are forced to be more creative and innovative to prove themselves in global market, thus, boosting their productivity. Take, for example, Vingroup in Vietnam, which has experienced a significant change ranging from small shops to an array of large industries covering a myriad of important sectors, such as education and medical care. Finally, when exposed to different traditional identities, people would have a deep understanding of other cultures, thereby avoiding cultural shocks or unwanted intense conflicts.
On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that in fact this development would pose a threat to important national and traditional values. This is due to international companies bringing their own cultures to wherever they settle down, which directly affects people’s belief and current lifestyles in the surrounding environment. Consider the are acceptance of same sex marriages, which used to be strongly opposed in the past in Vietnam. Another case in point, the appearance of fast food chains, like KFC, changes eating habits of individuals by providing an alternative option. This underestimates the importances of family meals as the way older generations did.
In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance, however I feel that business and traditional contacts should be encouraged. This is due to the cultural and social advantages it brings.
- Should Governments spend more money on improving road and highways or should goverments spend more money on improving public transportation buses trains subways Why Use specific reasons and details to support your answer
- Some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experiences and personal qualities when they look for an employee Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 84
- In many parts of the world children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this happening How should they be punished 78
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 80
- Many animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions to solve this issue 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...usinesses in a country, they will offer a large number of job opportunities for local residents. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36388888889 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06910003095 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638888888889 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.313879086 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.588235294 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1764705882 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76470588235 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138251306173 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391612128823 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035795190854 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831532522266 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193629710203 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.