Some people claim that the government should offer criminals education and job training instead of putting them to prison. While it is true that education and job training are the efficient methods, I believe imprisoning them is the best way.
To begin with, there are some reasons why we should give education and job training to offenders. Firstly, by providing criminals vocational skills can help them become useful citizens, which positively reduces financial burden for their country. In fact, there are a significant amount of the government’s budget spent on imprisonment. If the authorities send offenders into prison, they cannot work to make profits for the state. Furthermore, education would raise offenders’ awareness, making them distinguish between right and wrong. Therefore, they would not participate in unlawful actions in the future. Finally, since everyone has right to live, offering education and job training is synonymous to giving them a chance to start their own lives again. This activity reflects a sense of humanity, which is necessary to keep the sustainable development of the nation.
However, I would argue that the most effective way is to put criminals into prison. First, because offenders have to take charge of what they have done, they need to be jailed to warn others. If the government educate and give these individuals job training, other people would not be afraid and keep committing crimes. As a result, there might be an increase in the rate of crime. Additionally, by taking this measure, criminals lose freedom and have much time alone to think about their illegal behaviors. Consequently, they would feel regretful about their wrongdoing and avoid breaking the law after being released. This leads to a safer society.
In conclusion, while education and job training can bring a number of benefits, I believe that putting offenders into prison is the better method.
- Many animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions to solve this issue 73
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk about the dangers of committing a crime To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008 78
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 280, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...untry. In fact, there are a significant amount of the government’s budget spent on imp...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27035830619 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78998166808 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596091205212 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.151725377 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8888888889 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0555555556 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302246393847 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085219634774 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913430500579 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211035513496 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106598310523 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.