Some people think that increasing communication usage of computers and mobile phones by young people has had a negative effect on their reading and writing skills.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Today, in this advanced society, some people are debating that raising communication by using high-tech gadgets might have some detrimental effects on youngsters. As their opinions are, I concur that in some ways, technology inevitably affects their literacy skills.
To begin with, advanced technology offers inhabitants innumerable opportunities in learning processes. Seemingly, high-tech gadgets help young people to gain a wide range of information about reading and writing skills faster in the short of time, which dramatically convenient. For example, Grammarly's website has found its reputation for allowing people to learn how to correct their sentences, dissertations, academic essays, and can improve their English vocabulary in reliable sources. Besides, high technology also makes students learning easier and smoother, which have vivid images, so they not bore during their study. That is to say, people in general and youngsters in particular can have tremendous advantageous from high technology.
Notwithstanding high-tech gadgets provide benefits to adolescents, the adverse effects of technology shall have the focus of the argument nonetheless. In detail, the reason why using such virtual communication has negative aspects is that teenagers nowadays are in pursuit of reducing words during their conversation, for example, abbreviate, which might cause informal sentences and utterly damage to their skills. Still, primarily relates to writing performances, the young's abilities will decline over time, albeit reading skills can enhance through the screen. Consequently, if we want to mitigate the effects that technology has created, the young need to utilise its practical benefits.
To recapitulate, however much high technological innovation has some imperfectness points, the real value of commendable features outweigh its detrimental impacts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-03 | Raju godara | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | nhinhi999 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | trangmiu | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-01 | Minyuu_Ivy | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Shivam patel | 78 | view |
- Some people prefer to provide help or support directly to the local community. Others prefer to give money to national or international charitable organizations. Discuss both views and give ur opinions? 89
- Some people think that increasing communication usage of computers and mobile phones by young people has had a negative effect on their reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- People attend colleges or universities for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge etc.). Why do you think people attend colleges or universities? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, however, if, nonetheless, so, still, for example, in general, in particular, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.02996254682 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06480570158 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651685393258 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4811914059 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.166666667 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197050801723 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691077742877 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443206922327 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117865674159 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605073911228 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.99 12.4159519038 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.