Nowadays, the growth of the COVID-19 pandemic is leading to the rise of mobile phone and computer consumption; therefore, a group of people believe that humans are losing the ability to communicate face-to-face due to this increase. I concur with this statement up to some point.
Firstly, social media is one of the main reasons why people minimize their face-to-face communication skills. Specifically, social media sites are replacing regular interaction with unlimited distance contact, no delay time, and multitasking. All these functions can easily be found on Facebook, Instagram. Thus, many people prefer to use social media without any defense from its harmful sides, which are the lack of body language and monotone in words lead to the following reason. Secondly, people may be afraid to communicate virtually and gradually lose communication ability like utilizing body language or monotone, especially the Youth. When the fear grows with age, they lose the capability to interact face-to-face.
Factually, phones and computers are not merely social media. However, if people can use it wisely, it can broaden one's horizon with several clicks. Moreover, if the government can raise citizens' awareness about harmful social sites and impose stricter punishment, the problem is almost solved. Finally, the development of social networks is integral; therefore, humanity oughts to deal with this problem, not eliminate it.
In conclusion, I agree with the phenomenon up to the point that people can lose their abilities to communicate by using some functions of phones and computers in high frequency. Nevertheless, other features help humanity greatly; consequently, the problem comes from users, neither phones nor computers.
- In many places prisons are overcrowded and expensive for governments to maintain Yet when offenders are released they end up back in prison a short while later Does prison work Should lawbreakers be rehabilitated or punished 71
- In the past, when students did a university degree, they tended to study in their own country. Nowadays, they have more opportunity to study abroad. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development? 84
- The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the ma 89
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the Internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 84
- In some countries, the average worker is obliged to retire at the age of 50, while in others people can work until they are 65 or 70. It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and that fo 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...eople can use it wisely, it can broaden ones horizon with several clicks. Moreover, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58490566038 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91763277156 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633962264151 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0464474368 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.714285714 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366557969893 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120659267298 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108843064816 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231938619193 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811823475488 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.