Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent, do you agree or disagree?
The alterations in climate have recently been a severe problem which almost every people have to raise awareness about and deal with. It has been suggested that humans should propose adaptable solutions to climate change rather than figure out the way to prevent it. I strongly disagree with this opinion and the reasons will be presented in this essay.
For the first reason, prevention is much easier and more efficient than finding the way to deal with climate change with the giving hands of the communities. The increasing awareness of their doings with the residential environment in every fellow citizen is one of the best solutions. The single biggest way individuals make an impact on climate change is voicing their concerns about the climate change affairs and ensuring their relatives, friends, and neighbors stop harmful behaviours to the environment. Organizations also conduct quite a few planting tree campaigns to not only produce new leases of fresh air but protect and retain the ozone layer around the Earth, the most significant shield against negative changes in weather as well.
Preventing climate change is much more economical than searching technological methods to cope with it. The fellow citizens could reduce water and electricity consumption, use solar panels to generate natural energy, and afford fuel-efficient vehicles to name a few. All the above activities not only help every family save a significant amount of money for bills of heat and lighting waste but also reduce the quantity of pollutants disposed of in the environment every month. As a consequence, the alterations in weather would change in a positive way.
In conclusion, I can see no reason why finding the way to adapt to climate change could be the priority to preventing it. Some people may argue that searching for the adaptive methods is the better choice, but in my opinion, we could prompt to combine these two approaches to climate change with each other rather than just one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-02 | Amarul Azmi | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | Nhun Nhun | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | bnhanh02 | 87 | view |
| 2022-10-29 | Hangphan02 | 73 | view |
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for yo 78
- Many people think that personal happiness is directly related to economic success Others argue that happiness depends on other factors Discuss both sides and give your opinion 56
- The maps below illustrate changes in a student s common room 73
- Advantages and disadvantages of computers in education 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 537, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...the alterations in weather would change in a positive way. In conclusion, I can see no reason...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, well, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15076923077 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70909054807 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587692307692 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.6729856954 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.769230769 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271718552948 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983529679806 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637989284281 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16863574474 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474619918513 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.