The maps below illustrate changes in a student’s common room.
The given maps compare the alternations in a popular room for students.
Overall, though the room’s capacity for individuals does not change, it has been refurbished with more electronic devices and a new area for relaxing.
At the first time, there were four table sets, each of which had one table and four chairs, stretching along the length of the room. Leaning against the wall in the western side were a cupboard, a sink, two benches, a microwave and a refrigerator. A bookshelf was placed at the right corner of the room.
After the refurbishment, two table sets of four chairs and one table are still remaining, but the others have been replaced by a much bigger rectangular table with eight chairs surrounded, so that a triangle has been created from these three sets in the middle of the room. The conveniences on the left side have not been altered much from the beginning but a new microwave is in the place of the old bench. At the right corner of the room is a new television, on the left of which are brand benches for laptops and on the other side are some armchairs for students to relax.
- Many people think that personal happiness is directly related to economic success Others argue that happiness depends on other factors Discuss both sides and give your opinion 56
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Advantages and disadvantages of computers in education 61
- The diagram shows the process of growing tea for selling in supermarkets Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant 83
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62311557789 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59802396875 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547738693467 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.520871515 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108981857095 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554405269053 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487782527184 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0805263591807 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044014110298 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.