Some people think that instead of preventing climate-change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is evident that the global-warming issue has been gaining the spotlight all over the world due to its substantial implications on human life. Although the concept of coexistence between humans and climate change seems to be plausible, this cannot be taken as the ultimate measure to fight off climate change.
There are a number of reasons why coexistence can do more harm than good. First, global warming is largely formed by human activities than nature itself. For example, the appeal of the economic drive is too much to resist that most nations depend on carbon-rich fuels to produce energy such as gas, oil, coal, most of which are non-renewable energy, which directly connects with the intensification of global warming. Second, despite the fact that citizens agree to maintain the environment the way it is, organizations and enterprises, especially in the manufacturing and mining sectors, would not as that would compromise their profits. Therefore, it can be inferred that if corporations were not held accountable for their contribution to global warming, as in the case of coexistence, the issue of climate change would inevitably be exacerbated.
Nevertheless, it can be more economically advantageous to actively prevent climate change than to ignore it. In fact, the cost, either financial or non-financial, of dealing with the future predicaments of climate change can be gigantic. For instance, the prolonged drought and frequently changing weather patterns in far-north of Africa, not to mention the loss of ice patches in Antarctica, can cause massive destruction to wildlife habitats and local livelihoods, which would take decades to rebound. In addition, rising temperatures have also contributed to the extinction of many species worldwide. It is worth noting that the extinction is irreversible and comes at a cost to the ecosystem and humans living with it.
In conclusion, fighting off global warming must be regarded as a top priority provided the high urgency. Measures should be taken in no time to ensure climate change remains at bay.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-02 | Amarul Azmi | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | Nhun Nhun | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | bnhanh02 | 87 | view |
| 2022-10-29 | Hangphan02 | 73 | view |
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management eff 78
- There are more advertisements aimed at children Some people believe that they have negative effects on children and should be banned Do you agree or disagree 84
- The qualities that help people reach success in modern life cannot be learned in university or other academic institutions To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people live longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31914893617 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07787044279 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607902735562 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9522980379 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123924560343 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434447919765 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363932897905 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722560492829 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264084217157 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.