Task 2 Today animal experiments are widely used to develop new drugs to test the safety of other products Some argue that these experiments should be banned because inflicting pain on animals is morally wrong while others support them for their benefit to

Essay topics:

Task 2: Today, animal experiments are widely used to develop new drugs to test the safety of other products. Some argue that these experiments should be banned because inflicting pain on animals is morally wrong, while others support them for their benefit to humanity.”
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

While some argue that it is justifiable to prohibit the use of animals for scientific research concerning the degradation of moral values, others otherwise support its unparalleled utility for the benefit of humanity. In my opinion, it is important to consider the moral consequences of inflicting pain on animals and the available alternatives to animal experimentation.

On the one hand, detractors of animal experimentation often cite moral and ethical concerns. They argue that animals also have the capacity to experience sufferings and that it is morally wrong to use them as mere tools for scientific advancement. Experimental animals are burned, hampered, poisoned and abused in harsh chemical, drug, food and cosmetics trials, and then die brutally to no avail, as test subjects to such experiments might not prove productive. Additionally, they assert that the results of animal experimentation might not be validly applicable to all humans and that the use of animals in research is a manifestation of speciesism, the doctrine that the interests of one species are more vital than those of another. Such experiments cause tremendous suffering to animals and violate animals’ rights, and thus should be banned for good.

On the other hand, the advocates of animal experimentation point out the necessity of advancing medicine and science to aid human longevity. It is evident that dozens of lifesaving drugs and medical treatments have been successfully developed through animal experimentation. It is also essential for testing the safety and validity of products such as household cleaners and cosmetics, which are used globally by millions of people on a daily basis. Therefore, it plays a critical role in helping researchers identify undesired or side effects of new potential drugs such as liver damage, infertility and cancer-casing element. Furthermore, they assert that even though other means of testing drugs or products may exist, they may not produce as accurate and reliable results as animal experimentation.

In conclusion, the use of animals in scientific research remains a contentious topic, with valid arguments from both sides. While it is noteworthy to consider the implications of moral issues and the application of available replacements to animal experiments, if possible, animal testing should be executed in a virtuous manner with strict guidelines to minimize animal suffering and maximize the merits for humankind.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-19 chinh11111 78 view
Essays by user chinh11111 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 309, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a virtuous manner" with adverb for "virtuous"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ible, animal testing should be executed in a virtuous manner with strict guidelines to minimize anim...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53439153439 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22214402908 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550264550265 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.8766863874 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.428571429 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427645839743 0.244688304435 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141285926976 0.084324248473 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07151765931 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253264554522 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542101049254 0.056905535591 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.