Some people think that international travel makes them prejudiced rather than broad-minded.
Give reasons why people fail to benefit from travel and how to improve the understanding of
countries you visit.
Recent years have witnessed an increase in international tourism, raising many questions of prejudices against the countries visited. Given that failing from profiting from international travel could be attributed to many reasons, there are many measures to promote the understanding of countries visited.
There are many reasons why international travel leads to the bias in the countries visited. First, The increase in social unrests and the deterioration of political soundness in the countries visited could put the life of foreign visitors in jeopardy. In fact, many Western visitors venturing to many war-torn countries in Africa such as Egypt and Morrocco were killed and abducted by extreme religious groups, thereby having prejudices that Africa means terrorism and bigotry. Second, Visiting other countries is invariably associated with the possibilities of experiencing the local cultures and indigenous customs, thereby having biased perceptions of the locals. For example, many outbound tourists visiting India having a deeper understanding of the conventions of gender preferences and therefore in the belief that India people always undermine women’s rights and gender equality.
However, the official authorities and tourists themselves should undertake some initiatives to enhance the knowledge of the countries they visit. First, governments should advertise positive imagines and footages about many beauty spots and traditional cultures on social networks and foreign trip advisor websites. For instance, By applying screen tourism showing videos of many idyllic forests and mountains and positive social norms of native dwellers, Iceland has had a good reputation in the international travel industry as a country with beautiful landscapes and friendly citizens. In addition, Tourists should refer to some travel bloggers or even governments’ travel guide websites for information enhancement, thereby knowing some dangerous destinations or some strict laws of the countries they visit in advance.
In conclusion, that international travel act as a deterrent for visitors from benefiting could stem from the social insecurity and old traditional cultures of the host countries. The public officials and tourists themselves should take some measures such as advertisement and information reference to guarantee the advantages of international tourism.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-08 | grahamoneil | 73 | view |
- Some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today’s life. Others argue that the history is a valuable source of information. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Some people believe that it is a good idea to continue to work at their old age Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think international cooperation has brought benefits to world environmental protection while others believe more benefits have been brought to international business Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote naturalenvironment, such as the South Pole. Do you agree or disagree with thisdevelopment? 73
- the graphs below show the changes in age structure of population in a European country from 1901 to 1981 an a projection to 2021 44
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2054.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.00584795322 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09093510548 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.4666324258 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.0 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3076923077 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185964386847 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733760517303 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631094813716 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121064801698 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0137104501473 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.