Nowadays, as women and men have to work full time, household duties should be equally divided. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, the pattern of shared household responsibilities has been attracting a great deal of media attention worldwide due to its substantial impacts on the quality of marriage. I agree with the proposal that household duties should be equally divided.
Divided household duties could bestow positive impacts on both men and women. First, shared household duties are invariably associated with a reduction in household burdens on females. This would facilitate their higher commitment and dedication to the workplace, promoting their promotion prospects. Shared household responsibilites strenghten the stability of marriage. This means that women no longer have to be at odds with their spouse on the grounds that they no longer have to bear all the burdens of housework themselves without any support of husbands.
Additionally, this pattern could lead to many desirable effects on children. First, Shared household responsibilities could be conducive to a happier marriage, improving children’s living standards. In fact, Conflicts stemming from inequalities in household share could feed into even more serious arguments, impairing childrens’ mental development. In addition, Parents dividing housework equally could set a good example for their children. High degree of exposure to these practices in children could act as an incentive for them to appreciate the value of responsibility, gender equality and sympathy especially when they involve in romantic relationships in the future.
In conclusion, I believe that shared housework should be supported by citizens in all over the world especially those in Asia where exists the prevalence of ingrained gender preferences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-29 | truognchinh | 73 | view |
| 2017-06-17 | grahamoneil | 61 | view |
- The given pie charts compare the expenses in 7 different categories in 1966 and 1996 by American Citizens 49
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia 84
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why it is the case?. What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places. 78
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82071713147 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22782442125 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621513944223 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2766876438 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.384615385 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204542978742 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851410431031 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105455546106 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127020843376 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712001445612 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.