Some people think that it is acceptable to use the animals in any way for benefit od human being. While others think that it is not justifiable discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Animals’ right regulation has generated a great deal of discussions. For this reason, some people believed that using animals to everything that people want in order to beneficial purpose is more likely acceptable. However, others argue that it is unforgivable as animals are also inhabitants in the world. While it is reasonable, I am totally convinced that there are several measurements to consider using animals such as species extinction, food chains, and respecting green idea.
On the one hand, animals can bring a numerous number of advantages to human life. So, people argue that it is acceptable to use them in any way. As a straightforward example, people can use a cow and the other animals as their food. Again, they are not only eating something from a cow but also use the skin or even use their ability in agriculture. Therefore, animals are completely essential for human life to help them in the predictability of everyday life. Thanks to animals bring a great benefit for people; they believe that it is acceptable to kill them. Yet, there is an ethical side to refuse the argument.
On the other hand, some people believe that using animals without considering their condition is an unforgivable activity. It is because animals are also inhabitants in this earth. For instance, if people kill bluntly and regularly the animals only for their necessary, it is not humanism. As a consequence, animal rights are regulated to take up against the perception of using animal in any way. Therefore, animal should not be used to human benefit if it is not urgent and is inappropriate.
The animals, I am of opinion, should be deserved and should keep them as there is a number of measurements. First of all, the species which are going to extinct are completely dangerous for humans' life. If all animals, which have a small number habitat in the world, do not exist anymore, people will not have food resources anymore from the animals. Secondly, the case can break of the food chains which have already existed on many years. Lastly, as food chains are getting rid off, it will damage considerably nature surrounding. Consequently, it will be serious as a problem of humans' life if people use animals to their benefit of human being.
In conclusion, although animals are tremendously useful for human life, people should pay more attention to the animal’s condition as it can be dangerous for environment. Where possible, people can use or kill animals, while they should make a conservation to deserve them. It can keep environmental from untold damage and deserve food chains.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2015-01-13 | Fadlanmuzakki | 73 | view |
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 80
- Some people believe that technological tools such as body scanner and CCTV have significantly enhanced our safety and security while others feel that they have resulted In a loss of privacy Do the benefits of these items outweigh their disadvantages 80
- Some people prefer to spend ther lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Other, however think that change is a good thing. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 70
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 80
- Recently some people can work from home using modern technology. Some think this only benefits the workers, but not the employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Comments
correction = there is a
correction =
there is a number of measurements = there are a number of measurements
that people want in order to beneficial purpose is more likely acceptable
that people want for beneficial purpose is more likely acceptable
flaws:
No. of Words: 435 while No. of Different Words: 194
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 435 350
No. of Characters: 2096 1500
No. of Different Words: 194 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.567 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.818 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.734 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 151 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 109 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.775 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.64 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.312 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.493 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.119 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5