Some people think it is a good thing for senior managers to have much higher salaries than the other workers in a company. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, there has been increasing advocacy that the significant disparities between senior executives and other junior counterparts within a company are rational. In my opinion, I completely agree with this suggestion as it reflects the demanding nature of high-level positions and boosts employees’ motivation.
The noticeable gap between the salaries of senior managers and other members mostly arises from the harsh requirements of high-level positions. It is an obvious fact that senior executives bear more weighty responsibilities. Whereas junior employees just have to do specific tasks, their senior counterparts operate the company through complicated jobs such as shaping the strategic direction and navigating complex challenges. For instance, when a company encounters issues, boards of directors are often the first who are held accountable so such positions are hard roles to stay and it is reasonable for them to earn higher incomes than others within a company.
Another noteworthy point is that senior managers are required to possess a vast amount of experience and skills. For example, in order to attain high-level positions, a person has to have a minimum of 5 years of experience as well as acquire multiple degrees and awards. Thus, a generous salary for managers serves as an effective motivation for employees, which is considered as an encouragement for the staff to strive for promotion, obtain higher income, and get better quality of life. If the salary differences stay insignificant and uncompetitive, individuals may feel demotivated to exert effort.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that higher salaries for senior executives are beneficial because senior ones suffer more weighty responsibilities and these disparities will encourage junior employees to work harder and strive for promotion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-09 | too3ig | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-25 | jay1451 | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-26 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-21 | Hiểu Minh | 61 | view |
- The line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 from four village libraries and the pie chart shows the percentages of books by type that were borrowed over this time 89
- Most countries aim to improve their standard of living through economic development but many important social values can be lost as a result Do the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- All university students should do some voluntary work to help the local community To what do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that exams are an inappropriate way of measuring students performance and should be replaced by continuous assessment Do you agree or disagree with this view 89
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, thus, well, whereas, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63309352518 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15571584882 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615107913669 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.2045000605 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.363636364 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2727272727 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254598732573 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852075516613 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409176428057 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1459031714 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455291367463 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.