Some people think it is a good thing for senior managers to have much higher salaries than the other workers in a company. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Whether managers should receive higher income than their subordinates has been an interest to the general public. In my opinion, this definitely bring positive impacts on workers and firms.
On the one hand, to achive managerial roles, individuals have to illustrate their discipline and dedication which is regularly regarded as implicit presentation of contribution. Thus, by paying higher for those, companies not only attribute the staff with outstanding performance but encourage other to put pour greater effort in their work. In addition to motivation, given their lucrative salary, managers are not likely to shirk their responsibility while in difficulty. Likewise, as burden of paying bills have been stripped off, which enables management roles to focus on other aspects of their job and climb high on the career ladder.
From businesses’ standpoint, highly rewarding to management positions often go hand in hand with low turnover and foster commitment of their workforce. This is especially true when it comes to the fiercely competitive job market at which acquisitions of talents from opponents has become the norm for the time being. One prime example is that stealing skillful programmers in technological industry by simply offering more job prospects as well as salary increase has happened for years due to the shortage of human resources in the domain of business. Finally, Retaining numerous experienced and talented wage earners has been proven that it holds the key for companies’ flourishment. Therefore, maintaining excellent individuals by rewarding more income is the least company’s owners could do to gain next achievement.
By contrast, surge of payload could create a heavy burden of businesses’s fund and put other employees at risk of bearing spiraling pressure. However, these affects are minor and not able to endanger firms.
In sum, paying higher wage for workers boost devotion of staff and benefit companies in many ways. Even though there are some negative effects but those are inferior to the merits brought.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-09 | too3ig | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-25 | jay1451 | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-26 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-21 | Hiểu Minh | 61 | view |
- If a product is good or it meets people s needs people will buy it So advertising is unnecessary and no more than entertainment Agree or disagree 89
- Companies use major sporting events to promote their products Some people think it has a negative effect on sport in general To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 67
- people move to different places several times during their life Causes Is this a negative or positive development 84
- Some people think watching TV is bad for children while others think that watching TV has more beneficial effects on children Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether managers should receive higher income t...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ubordinates has been an interest to the general public. In my opinion, this definitely bring p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, likewise, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92948374291 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64375 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.699674732 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.266666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176725827584 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523680718686 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356724554514 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897116287204 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361083388917 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.