Nowadays people use bicycles less as a form of transport. Why is that? What can we do to encourage people to use bicycles more?
It is become increasingly common that bicycles are less deployed to transport. New ways of transit and the shift in the workplace can be attributable to the phenomenon. Government interference should be welcomed to motivate the utilization of the vehicle.
The creations of the state-of-the-art vehicles such as cars, motorbikes, and public ones may act as a precursor to the change of people's altitude towards bicycles. The new modes of transport are quicker, more convenient, and more comfortable compared to their conventional counterpart. It is plain that commuting to work by bicycles emerges as physically demanding, let alone those who are disabled. Another issue faced by potential bicyclists is that the current working environment has exerted greater pressure on employees. This means that people are pressed by heavier workloads and extended working hours, thus they have to optimized their time for commuting to do their places of work. The hectic schedule thus prevents individuals opting for bicycles to travel from home to work and vice versa.
To support the usage of bicycles, the intervention of goverments is highly welcomed. The first measure is that the authorities can launch social programs to raise the awareness of the public about the merits of riding bycicles. Likewise, governmental organizations can make use of mass media to educate their citizen about the lessen impacts on the environment when people use bicycles. The deterioration of the environment is a topic of interest among the public in recent years. By acknowledging their meaningful contribution to ameliorate the impacts of pollution. The approach would be far more effective. Financial rewards for bicycle users as well as subsidies for bicycle manufacture can also be introduced to attract more people to use the vehicles.
In sum, the advent of modern vehicles and working environment burden are the main driving forces behind the movement of individuals from bicycles to other means of transport. It is thought that the role of governmental bodies is of primary importance to encourage people to harness bicycles more.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-25 | luongduc1504 | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-19 | Ivan Matthew Norwood | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-19 | Ivan Matthew Norwood | 89 | view |
- Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Most of our information comes from the Internet nowadays Some people say that a large part of the information we get is incorrect Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people say that increasing fuel costs could reduce environmental problems do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say that the main aim of advertising is to improve the sales of products that people do not really need To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...et alone those who are disabled. Another issue faced by potential bicyclists is t...
^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ss media to educate their citizen about the lessen impacts on the environment when people ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, likewise, may, so, thus, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39339339339 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06255368785 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564564564565 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4764745559 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7777777778 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31196999626 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804980682942 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861540839106 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174855011201 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515994873234 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.