Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems. To what extend do you agree or disagree ?
It is argued that budgets are supposed to be appropriated for road infrastructure instead of public transit systems. From the personal perspective, I totally disagree with the opinion as I believe both roads and public transportation should be equally invested.
There are merits of spending money on roads and motorways. The first benefit is that improved road quality stimulates national economic growth. Specifically, more roads and highways allows ease of logistics and goods movements and customers accessibility to even rural areas, enabling businesses to create higher profits. In addition, if governments pour more state budget into upgrading and constructing more roads and expressways, road safety shall be ensured. For instance, in Vietnam where once ranked first as the world’s highest number of traffic accidents, the Vietnamese government undertook an nation-wide traffic safety initiative where billions from public funds were directly diverted into road maintenance , construction of ring highways and installation of traffic lights and signs, thereby having reduced the national road fatalities rate by almost 50%
It is highly beneficial when public transportation is also adequately invested. From the environmental perspective, public transportation is considered a catalyst for the protection of environment and its sustainability. It has been scientifically proven that public transit produces 90% less carbon dioxide and 80% less in volatile organic compounds, per passenger mile, than private vehicles, being the culmination of the reduction in emissions and greenhouse gasses concentration. From social perspective, in order to solve mobility issues stemming from overpopulation in developing states, a reliable public transit could be the key. In areas where is crowded and the majority of habitants could not afford cars, public transport use are recommended because transit vehicles are larger in capacity and the most inexpensive modes of travel.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that both roads and public transportation should be equally spent on. The reason is that while the betterment of road quality offers economic boost and road safety, public vehicles help solve environmental and mobility issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-07 | grahamoneil | 89 | view |
- Some people think that success in life comes from hard work and determination. Others think money and appearance are more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion 85
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is in this case Is a positive or negative development 86
- It is often thought that the increase in juvenile crime can be attributed to violence in the media. What do you think is the reason for a growth in the rate of juvenile crime? What solutions can you offer to deal with this problem? 84
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote naturalenvironment, such as the South Pole. Do you agree or disagree with thisdevelopment? 67
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 601, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ts, the Vietnamese government undertook an nation-wide traffic safety initiative w...
^^
Line 3, column 719, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... directly diverted into road maintenance , construction of ring highways and insta...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82674772036 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16417184601 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604863221884 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.535489854 49.4020404114 212% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 147.461538462 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201932037556 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830165124059 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437041474457 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126484667511 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146915521136 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.