In some parts of the world it is increasingly popular to research the history of one's own family. Why do people want to do this? Is it a positive or negative development?
Recent decades have witnessed the upsurge in the number of citizens researching the history of their ancestors, sparking a great deal of public attention. Given that this pattern could be attributed to many reasons, it could lead to many positive consequences.
There are many reasons leading to this trend. First, by digging into the family’s history, individuals could know whether there are congenital diseases in their family’ genetic sequence and therefore get them eradicated. In addition, investigating the family’s ancestors is invariably associated with a deeper understanding of family’s heroic deeds and forefathers’ famous achievements, which could make their descendants highly respected by society.
It should be acknowledged that researching the family’s history could bestow net positive benefits. First, It would act as a deterrent for people from being sensitive to crippling diseases, shortening their life expectancy. For example, OneRepublic’s leading singer has undergone operations amputating his genitalia when he knows that he could be susceptible to hereditary prostate cancer from his grandfather. Second, families with many important contributions to the country could receive pecuniary assistance from governments, which could release their financial burdens. In fact, after proving that their grandparents used to be soldiers fighting for the Independence of Vietnam, many families could profit from monetary aid and be prioritised in many public services, remarkably extricating them from the cycle of poverty.
In conclusion, health protection and financial rewards could be instrumental in the upward pattern of many individuals investigating their family’s history. This trend could culminate in many desirable consequences pertaining to longer longevity and releasing economic burdens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-29 | drtruong92 | 61 | view |
| 2017-07-29 | grahamoneil | 73 | view |
| 2017-07-29 | ntkcn | 56 | view |
- Teachers used to convey information but now with wide resources of information there is no role for teachers to play in modern education To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
- The number of people working online from home has grown in some countries What advantages and disadvantages can come of this trend 60
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people say that it is impossible for a country to br both economically successful and have a clean environment. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 92
- As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the user should cover the costs. Discuss and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pos;s heroic deeds and forefathers' famous achievements, which could make th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.2 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38005812071 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1423053049 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0848006498033 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432916832298 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359461008984 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0616260164092 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178025646813 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.68 12.4159519038 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.