Some individuals claim that it is more vital to budget finances on the developments of the national road system than on public transport. This essay disagrees that more attention should be paid to the construction of roads than on the improvements of the country’s public transport. Instead, buses and subways should be prioritized because it helps to reduce environmental pollution and road congestion.
Were more money to invest in building more and more roads and motorways, the number of automobiles on the roads will increase dramatically, which leads to higher levels of emission. In contrast, the developments of public transport result in a reduced number of cars, thereby lowering carbon dioxide and toxic gas production. In other words, since the buses are capable of transporting more passengers at a time than a personal car, they help to combat air and noise pollution, which are detrimental problems in cities. This is supported by a recent study conducted at Oxford University, in which they claim that greenhouse gas emissions can be reduced by 88% if people use public transport to commute at least 14 days per month.
Not only does the pollution, but switching the mode of transport to buses can reduce the traffic congestion, especially in rush hours. Put simply, more vehicles mean more congestion. Congested roads, in turn, reduce the efficiency of transport and are more prone to cause road traffic accidents. Therefore, investing more finances to improve the public transport system will increase the effectiveness of the national transport system, and at the same time ensures the reduced number of motor crashes. According to the annual newsletter of the National Transport Ministry, 75% of traffic accidents would have been prevented if individuals had used buses instead of their cars.
In conclusion, some contend that it is worth allocating more money on the road system rather than on public transport. This essay disagrees with this point of view as this mode of conveyance is extremely helpful in lowering the environmental threats caused by personal vehicles and in reducing traffic congestion, which increases the efficiency of transport and reduces the number of motor accidents.
- People find it very difficult to speak in public or to give a presentation before an audience Do you think public speaking skill is really important Give reasons 78
- The charts below provide information on popular modes of transport in the city of Cambridge for the years 2008 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- Some people think people working in creative arts should be financially supported by government Others think they should find financial support from other resources Discuss both sides and give your opinion 77
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 70
- The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, at least, in conclusion, in contrast, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31161473088 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91615231733 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495750708215 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.9879049191 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.928571429 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2142857143 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160058751599 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774593562701 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776161160175 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119314685637 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306709473307 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.