Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on publictransport systems To what extend do you agree

It's argued that more funds should be allocated to the traffic infrastructure rather than public transport systems. Personally, I think both thoroughfare and public transport systems have vital roles to play in modern society, and therefore should be equal.
On the one hand, better roads increase the levels of safety and reduces traffic congestion. As many accidents happen due to lack of adequate road infrastructure. Moreover, wider roads and a large number of highways can ease congestion in densely populated areas.For example, If roads are wider in areas like Slums of Mumbai, it will lead to smooth running of vehicles there and it will also prove helpful in saving the time of people. Because they will not be stuck in a traffic jam.
On the other hand, improved buses, trains and underground systems help in protecting the environment and benefit those who do not have their own vehicles. Public shipping is used by nearly 20 people's at one time. As a result, the number of personal vehicles is reduced on the path and environment is also protected from pollution. A research has proved that the level of toxins in the air is 20% less in the areas where masses prefer to use public transit. And it is also beneficial for those who have been migrated from one place to another and they don't have their personal means of transportation, and they use public means.
In conclusion, I believe that government should spend money not only on the roads but public shipment also.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 92, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... safety and reduces traffic congestion. As many accidents happen due to lack of ad...
^^
Line 2, column 188, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...frastructure. Moreover, wider roads and a large number of highways can ease congestion in densely...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 262, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...e congestion in densely populated areas.For example, If roads are wider in areas li...
^^^
Line 2, column 435, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e helpful in saving the time of people. Because they will not be stuck in a traffic jam...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: Research
...nment is also protected from pollution. A research has proved that the level of toxins in ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ated from one place to another and they dont have their personal means of transporta...
^^^^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...t only on the roads but public shipment also.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88492063492 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66528155165 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7226967684 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.583333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112833651533 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408178686805 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360018300531 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765267693005 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330281949967 0.056905535591 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.