Some people think the manufacturers and shopping malls should sell fewer packaged products while others argue that people have the responsibility to buy products with less packaging. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
There has been a debate in terms of packaging goods in society. While some people think that companies and marketplaces should retail simple packaged products, others think that it is the individual's responsibility to consume products with less packing. This essay will discuss arguments on both perspectives through the following paragraphs.
On the one hand, proponents of companies and the marketplace responsibilities highlight that it will reduce environmental impact and contribute significantly to waste generation. This action solely can be done by goods providers as they can prioritize eco-friendly packaging solutions to mitigate these impacts such as producing products that do not contain more plastic wrap. In addition, it is logical to assume that companies would take this action as they may get benefits for resource efficiency by reducing the materials needed for manufacturing products including water, energy, and raw materials which will reduce the cost of production.
On the other hand, though, supporters of individual’s responsibility argue that the distribution of less packaging products will be affected by a consumer decision. For instance, buyers who are willing to purchase products that deliver on sustainability claims will influence the manufacture of packing product packaging. This is because the more people buy simple packaged goods, the less compex-packaged products will be produced since the manufacturer follows the customer’s preference for the marketing matters. Furthermore, community engagement will help create awareness and encourage initiatives for sustainable consumption practices for human beings. For example, zero-waste movements that campaign principles to use eco-friendly packaging can alter people’s purchasing behavior which mainly choose products based on their appearance to become utility-based.
In conclusion, even though society plays a significant role in this matter, It seems to me that goods producers can contribute more in implementing the reduction of the use of complex packaging rather than society, in terms of mitigating negative impacts of environment and effectiveness in handling packaging processes.
- Some people think the manufacturers and shopping malls should sell fewer packaged products while others argue that people have the responsibility to buy products with less packaging Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 89
- nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries What are the reasons for this problem What are the effects on the society 73
- Some people say that art subjects such as music drama and creative writing are an essential part of education and every school should include them in its syllabus Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your opinion and examples from your own ex 67
- The demand for coaching services has grown significantly in the digital age with online coaching platforms becoming prevalent Some now feel online coaching is a superior option to in person coach To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...d products, others think that it is the individuals responsibility to consume products with...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...solely can be done by goods providers as they can prioritize eco-friendly packagi...
^^
Line 5, column 725, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ovements that campaign principles to use eco-friendly packaging can alter people’...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96825396825 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29716737113 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612698412698 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.6038766806 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.666666667 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286518545819 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115230028219 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106070604149 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182871877774 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121175720128 0.056905535591 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.64 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.