Some people think that men and women are different so men are more suitable for certain jobs and are the same with women. Do you agree or disagree?
There are millions of jobs in this modern era. There are physical differences between genders so the certain jobs are maybe suitable for a certain gender. Some physical labour works are more suitable for male for their distinctive physical features whereas dealing with a social relationship might be suitable for females. While I understand that there are some roles may be advantageous for specific genders, however I believe that the selection of roles should not be limited to gender preferences only.
As society develops, the millions of occupations have been created. Some of positions may be involving with labour works such as carrying heavy stuffs or mining works, and then this may be suitable for men since they have more muscles. According to US scientific journal, men have more muscles or have more cells that can easily transform to muscles than that of females. Therefore, men can be able to work in labour without any physical issues than that of females. Moreover, this is the same for females. Females are usually better in communication and dealing with people since they are mastered in speech and communication skills. Therefore, women are certainly better in certain positions than that of men.
However, it does not mean that those positions are stuck with the certain genders forever. As the society develops, certain gender preferred positions have transformed. Female preferred positions are now worked by males and vice versa. Women are doing a regular exercise to keep their body fit and strong as much as men so that they can work in the same conditions or same position as men. So it is very common to see that there are female soldiers, female cops or female miners. This is the same for men too. Nowadays, men are more sensitive or delegate to deal with customers and communications. As a result, the distinction of gender in a role has faded away.
In conclusion, it is understandable that some roles may be suitable for a certain gender in the case of the positions is involving with labour works. Even though those types of positions may be better for male to be working on due to their physical abilities, women can do the job as much as men. If the roles are limited to the genders, the occupations that people apply for will be restricted. This means the growth in occupation would be restricted. Thus, the roles should not be strict to the gender only.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2016-11-16 | jimpan | 56 | view |
2018-07-29 | paramveersingh | 56 | view |
- The following chart illustrates the results of a British survey taken in 2005 related to Housing preferences of UK people 75
- As a part of education, students should spend a period of time living in another country to learn its language and culture. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people think that we do not need to print papers newspapers anymore. Do you agree or disagree? 45
- Some countries are not popular with using a bicycle even though it is benificial for tham. why?What are the possible solutions to envourage people to use more of bicycle as the main transport? 84
- The table below shows the results of a survey on workplace complaints in Germany in 2001. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 91, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ave been created. Some of positions may be involving with labour works such as carrying heav...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ain gender in the case of the positions is involving with labour works. Even though those ty...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus', 'whereas', 'while', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.220982142857 0.247107183377 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.162946428571 0.155533422707 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.109375 0.0946595960268 116% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0625 0.0501214627716 125% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0245535714286 0.0437548338989 56% => OK
Prepositions: 0.147321428571 0.122226691241 121% => OK
Participles: 0.0446428571429 0.0403226058552 111% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.65547748961 2.80594681477 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0245535714286 0.0326793684256 75% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0870535714286 0.0861772015684 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.03125 0.021408717616 146% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00446428571429 0.011925033212 37% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2401.0 1933.35771543 124% => OK
No of words: 408.0 316.048096192 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88480392157 6.12580529183 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.20517956788 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.343137254902 0.374742101984 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.254901960784 0.28420135186 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.183823529412 0.203846283523 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.110294117647 0.137316102897 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65547748961 2.80594681477 95% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.037074148 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43137254902 0.56093040696 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.9182558526 60.7387585426 76% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0891783567 149% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.7743622355 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4018688794 49.517814964 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.041666667 127.492653851 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7743622355 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.541666666667 0.814263465372 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 42.4901960784 49.1944974215 86% => OK
Elegance: 1.65178571429 1.69124875643 98% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415680937143 0.332605444948 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.133051311308 0.102741220458 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0701666688908 0.0668466124924 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.457949427514 0.534860350844 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.128549313104 0.148594505496 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145017677413 0.134430193775 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084708382172 0.0742795772207 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.356894522119 0.324371583561 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0289724700651 0.0638462369009 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295843663699 0.228012699653 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691323505938 0.058150111329 119% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.68436873747 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.41683366733 351% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 5.90881763527 85% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 1.9629258517 357% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.4468937876 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.