Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is argued whether spending money on the advancements of technology due to discover the outer space is a waste of public welfare or not. I am of the view that space exploration is profitable for human beings because of its long-term advantages, and governments should spend money related to this goal.
Firstly, the space missions have a positive impact on human body and people's health in general. Experiments performed in space contribute radically to understand the human body, and especially the effects of aging and sedentary lives. To illustrate this, there are many forms of science-investigation conducted in space owing to study the way our body changes in space. In this way, scientists understand the impacts of reduced levels of physical activity and issues that affect older adult populations on Earth. As a result, we need cutting-edge technology for deep-space destinations in order to use the knowledge obtained to improve our quality of life on Earth.
Secondly, another benefit of space exploration is its effects on education. Astronauts encourage young people to study science, since they motivate the young generations to continue their studies in the field of science, technology or engineering. For example, in Greece academic institutions organize speaking events in which astronauts from NASA discuss with students and pupils a wide range of topics regarding space. By developing the technological aspect of missions to the Moon and Mars, governments give to astronauts more experiences and knowledge useful for the education. Consequently, students can be aware of these issues by real talks instead of impersonal video streaming.
In conclusion, even if there are counterarguments, in my opinion we should certainly not ignore the important effects of the investment in space exploration regarding our health and the education of younger people
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-06 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | Vivi_peach | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
- Some people believe it is better to raise children in the city while others consider the countryside to be a more suitable choice Discuss both views and give your own opinion 90
- It is suggested that primary school children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location 78
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in general, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44863013699 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18090591078 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595890410959 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9911231347 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.384615385 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244462535866 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799453622004 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501631411703 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140798632138 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061263063849 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.