Some people think the money spent on developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people think the money spent on developing the technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many people believe it is a waste to spend on advancing galactic explorations and that there are other helpful methods to invest in. Personally, I completely agree with this view since not only space research is a risky investment in the resources of the world but also because of the urgent need for money to solve critical problems on the planet Earth.
On the one hand, space research is a department that doesn’t provide any results that are worth the money that has been spent on it. Although space research brings us scientific knowledge on how the cosmic works or finding a new home for humanity as the earth is slowly being affected by humans, it is clear that these macro subjects have yet to create satisfied outcomes that may shed light on the path of humanity. For instance, knowledge that has been found by scientists may only bring mental satisfaction without bringing value to the economy or any essential aspects of human lives. In addition, the missions in finding new home for humanity show the blurred result with 2 or 3 planets having the potential to become the new home for humanity, however, being incapable of reaching it due to the limit of technology and resources. Therefore, some considerations should be taken before investing more in space studying.
On the other hand, spending money on preventing and improving the society’s issues which may pose a threat to the lives of many citizens may be more beneficial in many aspects.
. In the modern days, we have to face many threats that are directly or indirectly caused by the advancement of humans. The increased frequency of unpredictable catastrophes or environments has tremendous effects on the assets and lives of many people. Furthermore, by allocating resources for advancing technology as well as preventing real threats first, it may become a strong foundation for the growth of space science. Consequently, it is important to prioritize investment in our home planet’s safety.
In conclusion, Despite the certain benefits of space exploration, I strongly believe that investment should be spent on protecting and advancing our lives beforehand.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-06 TLan168 78 view
2023-07-27 Zeroplague0407 73 view
2023-07-26 Vivi_peach 73 view
2023-07-24 hyentie 89 view
2023-07-24 hyentie 89 view
Essays by user Zeroplague0407 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...may be more beneficial in many aspects. . In the modern days, we have to face man...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g and advancing our lives beforehand.
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10795454545 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89572183073 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559659090909 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.6625012972 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.307692308 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0769230769 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9230769231 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190292418797 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640669658383 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479971370118 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102060695504 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443377768735 0.056905535591 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.