Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas. Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While some people argued that house construction should adopt the existing houses pattern in a resident area, others believe that one have a right to construct houses on their own designs. In my view, people should be encourage to build accommodation which follow the traditional houses architecture.
There are several reasons why it could be argued that homeowners may have the right to construct houses on their own design. First and foremost, people may not feel satisfied with the old designs. It would be against the law to force people to build houses in the existing architecture designs. Secondly, with the modern house architecture building, the cost of construction is likely to be cheaper than old buildings. For example, some materials, like wood, is commonly replaced by plastic materials or aluminum in-house construction.
However, in my view, newly built houses should adopt the architecture of traditional houses in a local area. From a societal point of view, living within a residential area that has similar houses can enhance the sense of community and equality. This is because a house often reflects the wealth and social status of its owners. If the homeowner lives in a small house and less attractive, they would feel less confident and inferior to their neighbor. In contrast, with people living in outstanding houses, it would make the owners the target of gossip and burglary. Furthermore, from an architecture perspective, modern houses alongside the styles of the old buildings can be an eyesore, they fail to blend with houses that were built perhaps in centuries.
Although many think that people have the right to build houses of their own patterns, I believe that it would better to construct buildings following the architecture of the traditional houses in a residential area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-04 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | 1 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Thùy Trang Trần | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Thùy Trang Trần | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-12 | thaotanya | 73 | view |
- The average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line services 2001 2010 67
- In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work Some people regard this as completely wrong while others consider it as valuable work experience important for learning and taking responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- The average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line services 2001 2010 67
- Some companies sponsor sports events as a way to advertise themselves Some people think it is good while others think it has some disadvantages Discuss both views and give your own idea 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encouraged'?
Suggestion: encouraged
...n designs. In my view, people should be encourage to build accommodation which follow the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'building'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: building
... In my view, people should be encourage to build accommodation which follow the traditio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'houses'' or 'house's'?
Suggestion: houses'; house's
...ommodation which follow the traditional houses architecture. There are several reason...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in contrast, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18367346939 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83573123739 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510204081633 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0851135277 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.857142857 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467692504102 0.244688304435 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167923424605 0.084324248473 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108319158897 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325225927442 0.151304729494 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755998639567 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.