Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas. Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Building houses in the local area should follow the style of the old houses according to some people, but others suggest that every person should have the freedom to develop their own houses. This is because the style of old houses is a symbol of local wisdom having become their identity. Meanwhile, building a house based on our style is a form of freedom as long as not have a negative effect on the local people.
Local wisdom as a mark of identity has to be represented in the building. This issue will support conditions, where in this era most people have not involved their culture to their daily life. We can look that many building in the city center is riddled with the concrete jungle or skyscraper. Based on data of Indonesia Architecture Organization in 2020, there was 150 tower building in the big cities such as Surabaya, Makassar, and Jakarta as capital city of Indonesia. This showed that even the government cannot maintain about establishment in this country to introduce their culture or identity in the style of building.
However, some people think that in this era, the methodology of architecture have developed, so efficiency is the crucial thing in this issue. According to the most architect said that developing some buildings with the local style will spend a lot of money and materials. For example, some masques with the local style in Java Island had spent income of Country around 250 billion rupiah in 2020. This is clearly give negative perspective to the government that should spent their income to other important sector such health and education.
In conclusion, this issue try to protect identity or culture in order to the people always aware to their culture. Yet, developing in era urges to make something efficiently, so the people choice to build appropriate their own style. If it is possible, we should take this issue into consideration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-04 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | 1 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Thùy Trang Trần | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Thùy Trang Trần | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-12 | thaotanya | 73 | view |
- In many countries schools have several problems with student s behavior What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 67
- Life expectancy is increasing. What are the reasons of this? Is this a positive or negative development? 73
- When designing a building the most important factor is the intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 415, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'given'.
Suggestion: given
...billion rupiah in 2020. This is clearly give negative perspective to the government ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 145, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'making'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'urge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: making
...r culture. Yet, developing in era urges to make something efficiently, so the people ch...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld take this issue into consideration.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.928125 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63223519264 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51875 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2979812535 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.133333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374724107021 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125043456547 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122809731885 0.0667982634062 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235544702673 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152529983962 0.056905535591 268% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.