Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas. Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While some believe that new houses should be built in an identical style to the existing ones in the area, others argue that people should have freedom to design their houses to their own liking. From my perspective, I am the latter school of thought.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why all buildings in a particular area should have the same style. Firstly, when houses look similar it will enhance a sense of community and equality within a residential area. This is because a house often reflects the wealth and social status of its owner. If a house looks older, smaller, and less attractive than others, the people living there may feel inferior and less confident when socializing with their neighbors. In contrast, a house which stands out in the neighborhood could potentially make its owner the target of gossip or burglary. Secondly, when houses share a common design, it will be easier for the local government to supervise the process of construction, and to make sure that these buildings are safe for both the inhabitants and neighbors.
On the other hand, it should be people’s right to build their own house in their own style. A good building should satisfy all three principles of durability, utility, and beauty. It should not only be strong in design and be built to last a long time, but also inspire the people who live there by its aesthetic design. It is extremely important for a person to live in a house that they feel comfortable with as it largely affects their spirit. Furthermore, if each house in an area is built in a unique style, it will greatly contribute to the diverse image of the town.
In conclusion, even though there are certain justifications for houses in an area to be constructed in the same style, I am of the opinion that governments should permit people to build their houses according to their own ideas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-04 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | 1 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Thùy Trang Trần | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Thùy Trang Trần | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-12 | thaotanya | 73 | view |
- the plans below show a harbour in 2000 and how it looks today Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society 78
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social center in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison whe 84
- The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend Do you agree or disagree 61
- the plans below show a harbour in 2000 and how it looks today Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an identical style" with adverb for "identical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...believe that new houses should be built in an identical style to the existing ones in the area, other...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peopled'?
Suggestion: peopled
...ors. On the other hand, it should be people’s right to build their own house in the...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a unique style" with adverb for "unique"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...more, if each house in an area is built in a unique style, it will greatly contribute to the dive...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76380368098 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61871400996 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536809815951 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8414322361 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.928571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470588305892 0.244688304435 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165671825372 0.084324248473 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143917646952 0.0667982634062 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335512403584 0.151304729494 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561018949033 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an identical style" with adverb for "identical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...believe that new houses should be built in an identical style to the existing ones in the area, other...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peopled'?
Suggestion: peopled
...ors. On the other hand, it should be people’s right to build their own house in the...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a unique style" with adverb for "unique"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...more, if each house in an area is built in a unique style, it will greatly contribute to the dive...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76380368098 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61871400996 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536809815951 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8414322361 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.928571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470588305892 0.244688304435 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165671825372 0.084324248473 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143917646952 0.0667982634062 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335512403584 0.151304729494 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561018949033 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.